Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 531 P&H
Judgement Date : 11 February, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
118 CWP-3153-2021
Decided on : 11.02.2021
Darshan Singh ... Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab & others ... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr.Gagneshwar Walia, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms.S.G.Randhawa, AAG, Punjab.
(The proceedings are being conducted through video conferencing,
as per instructions.)
G.S. Sandhawalia, J. (Oral)
Prayer in the present writ petition, filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India is for issuance of directions to the respondents to
consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Administrative
Officer in pursuance to the requisition letter dated 31.12.2020 (Annexure P-5).
The said relief is sought in terms of the instructions (Annexures P-10 to P-12)
issued by the Punjab Government that promotions are not to be withheld in
case the official against whom challan/charge-sheet has not been filed in the
Court or cancellation reports have been submitted.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is working as
Superintendent Grade-II and promotion is to be made to the post of
Administrative Officer. Respondent No.2 had asked for his Service Record
along with other similarly situated persons and in the said list, the petitioner's
name is at Sr.No.2 (Annexure P-5). Respondent No.3 has forwarded the case
of the petitioner wherein reference has been made to one FIR No.124 dated
30.05.2016 registered under Sections 420, 408, 477-A IPC. It has also been
noticed that he has been exonerated by the Senior Superintendent of Police,
1 of 2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
however, the cancellation report has been sent for approval on 15.10.2016
which is yet to be approved. It is, thus, submitted that in view of the judgment
in Balwant Ram Vs. State of Punjab & others 2019 (3) SCT 29, the
petitioner cannot be denied consideration for promotion. It is submitted that
the petitioner is due to retire on 30.04.2021 and the respondents are, thus,
dragging the issue, as such.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be satisfied if the
representation dated 15.01.2021 (Annexure P-9) filed by the petitioner for the
necessary relief is decided in a time-bound manner.
Notice of motion.
Ms.Randhawa accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
Keeping in view the limited relief sought in the present petition,
no useful purpose will be served to call for the reply as it would only delay the
proceedings since the decision making is yet incomplete. Resultantly, without
commenting upon the merits of the case and the entitlement of the petitioner
for promotion, the present petition is disposed of, by directing respondent No.1
to take a decision on the said representation (Annexure P-9) regarding the
promotion of the petitioner to the post of Administrative Officer, within a
period of 4 weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.
FEBRUARY 11, 2021 (G.S. SANDHAWALIA)
sailesh JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether Reportable: Yes/No
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!