Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Banshidhar Upadhyay vs The State Of Bihar
2026 Latest Caselaw 1214 Patna

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1214 Patna
Judgement Date : 12 May, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Patna High Court

Banshidhar Upadhyay vs The State Of Bihar on 12 May, 2026

Author: Anshuman
Bench: Anshuman
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7247 of 2026
     ======================================================
     Banshidhar Upadhyay Son of Jawahar Upadhay, Resident of- E-8, Phase-2,
     Ashiyana Nagar, P.S.- Rajiv Nagar, District- Patna.
                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                        Versus
1.    The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary Government of Bihar.
2.   The Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department Government of Bihar,
     Patna.
3.   The A.C.S. General Administration Department, Government of Bihar,
     Patna.
4.   The A.C.S. Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
5.   The Engineer in Chief Public Health Engineering Department, Government
     of Bihar, Patna.
6.   The Accountant General Bihar, Patna.

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s       :   Mr. Sarveshwar Tiwary, Advocate
     For the State              :   Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, AC to GP-20
     For the Accountant General :   Mr. Arun Kumar Arun, Advocate
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
     ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 12-05-2026

Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned

Counsel for the State and learned Counsel for the Accountant

General.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for issuance

of an appropriate writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the

respondents, especially respondent Nos. 2 to 5, for granting benefit

of annual increment for his last year of service which has been

denied to the petitioner on the ground that petitioner has retired on

30th June, 2018 and the annual increment as per 6th Pay revision

and 7th Pay revision has been made admissible to the employee on Patna High Court CWJC No.7247 of 2026 dt.12-05-2026

1st of July. For further direction to respondent Nos. 2 to 4 to treat

the date of retirement to the petitioner to be 1st July of his

respective year of retirement and to grant him all consequential

benefits including pensionary benefits. Further prayer is for

holding that it was incorrect as part of respondent Nos. 2 to 5 to

have denied the petitioner for his annual increment for his last year

of service in view of the fact that the petitioner, who retired on 30 th

June, 2018 in his respective year of his retirement had worked for

complete one year. Thus the annual increment which accrued on

the next date of his retirement i.e., 1 st July could not have been

denied. Further for any other appropriate relief or reliefs for which

the petitioner is entitled from the facts and circumstances of this

case.

3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the

benefit of annual increment for his last year of service has been

denied on the ground that the petitioner has retired on 30 th June,

2018 and his annual increment was accrued on 1 st July, 2018 but

without giving his annual increment and without revising his

pension on the basis of the said increment, the pension of the

petitioner was started by the respondent authority. Counsel submits

that in similarly situated matter in the case of Shiojee Rai and

Others Vs. State of Bihar decided on 29.04.2025 in CWJC No.

12575/2019, this Court has pleased to consider the case of the said Patna High Court CWJC No.7247 of 2026 dt.12-05-2026

petitioners about their entitlement. Learned Counsel for the

petitioner further submits that the petitioner may be considered in

the light of the findings given vide order date 29.04.2025 passed in

CWJC No. 12575/2019.

4. Learned Counsel for the State submits that request for

mandamus has been made but from the writ petition it transpires

that petitioner has come this Court without filing any

representation.

5. In that view of the matter, this writ petition is

disposed off directing the petitioner to file representation along

with a copy of this order within 30 days from today before

respondent No. 5, the Engineer in Chief, Public Health

Engineering Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. Upon

receipt of the representation, respondent No. 5, the Engineer in

Chief, Public Health Engineering Department, Government of

Bihar, Patna shall pass a reasoned and speaking order in

accordance with law within 90 days thereafter.

Mkr./-                                                             (Dr. Anshuman, J)


AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          13.05.2026
Transmission Date
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter