Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Raghunandan Paswan vs The State Of Bihar
2025 Latest Caselaw 4199 Patna

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4199 Patna
Judgement Date : 16 October, 2025

Patna High Court

Raghunandan Paswan vs The State Of Bihar on 16 October, 2025

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                 Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16249 of 2019
     ======================================================
     Raghunandan Paswan Son of Late Babu Lal Paswan Resident of Village-
     Sunder Kumhari, P.S.- Dobhi, District- Gaya.

                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                       Versus
1.   The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Food and
     Consumers Protection, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.   The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Gaya.
3.   The Sub Divisional Officer, Sherghati, (Gaya).
4.   The Block Supply Officer, Dobhi (Gaya).
5.   The Block Development Officer, Dobhi (Gaya).
6.   The Circle Officer, Dobhi (Gaya).

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :       Mr.Arvind Kumar Singh
     For the Respondent/s   :       Mr.Arvind Ujjwal (SC-4)
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY

                                  ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 16-10-2025

1. The writ petition is filed for the following

reliefs:-

"(i) For quashing of the order dated 19.08.17 passed in Licence Cancellation Case No.-13/2017 by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Sherghati (Gaya) whereby and whereunder the Licence No.-23/2016/432/2007 of the petitioner for his Public Distribution System for Village-Sundar Kumhari in Gram Panchayat-Kurmawa under Dobhi Block Patna High Court CWJC No.16249 of 2019 dt.16-10-2025

in the District of Gaya has been cancelled.

(ii) For quashing of the order dated 31.01.2019 passed in Supply Appeal No.-45/17 by the Respondent No.-2, whereby and whereunder the said Supply Appeal No.-45/17 filed against the Enquiry Report dated 25.05.2017 of Respondent No.-4 and against the order dated 19.08.2017 passed in Licence Cancellation Case No.-13/2017 by Respondent No.-3 of the Petitioner has been dismissed.

(iii) Further to re-store the Licence No.-23/2016/432/2007 of Public Distribution System of the Petitioner with immediate effect, so that the supply to him be re-store.

And/Or for any other appropriate relief(s) to the Petitioner for which he may be found entitled to in the eye of law."

2. At this juncture, the Learned counsel for

the respondents contended that Section 32 (vi) of

the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System

(Control) Order, 2016 provides for the provision of

revision. Section 32(v) and (vi) read as follows:

Patna High Court CWJC No.16249 of 2019 dt.16-10-2025

"32. (v) Till the disposal of appeal pending, the Appellate Authority may direct that the order under appeal shall not take effect for such period as the authority may consider necessary for giving a reasonable opportunity to the other party under sub- clause (4) or until the appeal is disposed of, whichever is earlier.

(vi) Due to non disposal of the appeal within sixty days by the District Officer or against the order passed in the appeal, a revision may be filed before the Divisional Commissioner. The revision shall be disposed of within two months."

3. Admittedly, the present case is filed

against the order dated 19.08.2017 passed by the

Sub-Divisional Officer, Sherghati, Gaya and the order

dated 31.01.2019 passed by the District Magistrate-

cum-Collector, Gaya.

4. The Learned counsel for the petitioner

contended that he intends to file a revision before

the Divisional Commissioner, but the limitation

period for filing the revision has lapsed. He prayed

for a direction to the concerned Divisional Patna High Court CWJC No.16249 of 2019 dt.16-10-2025

Commissioner to entertain the revision petition in

accordance with Section 5 of the Limitation Act.

5. Taking into consideration that the

petitioner has an alternative remedy for filing a

revision, the writ petition is disposed of with a

direction to the petitioner to file the revision petition

within a period of two months from the date of

receipt of this order before the Divisional

Commissioner. The delay in filing the revision shall

be condoned by the Divisional Commissioner, and

the authority shall dispose of the revision within

three months from the date of filing of the revision

petition.

6. With the above said observation, the Writ

petition is disposed of.

7. Interlocutory Application(s), if any, shall

stand disposed of.

(G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J)

vinita/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          17.10.2025
Transmission Date
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter