Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 973 Patna
Judgement Date : 1 August, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10622 of 2025
======================================================
Ram Prakash Chaudhary, Aged about 32 Yrs, Male, Son of Shiv Chaudhary,
Resident of Village- Bairiya, P.S. Muffasil, District-E. Champaran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through The Principal Secretary, Department of
prohibition and Excise, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2. The District Magistrate, Gopalganj.
3. The Superintendent of Excise, Gopalganj.
4. The Officer-in-Charge, Sidhwaliya Police Station, Dist. Gopalganj.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shanti Bhushan Singh
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Biru Prasad, GP 13
Mrs. Shweta Anand, AC to GP 13
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH
ORAL JUDGMENT
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI)
Date : 01-08-2025
Heard learned counsels for the parties.
2. In the instant writ petition, petitioner has prayed for
the following relief :-
"That this Civil Writ is being
filed on behalf of the petitioner for
direction upon the Respondents to
release the truck of the petitioner i.e. 14
(Fourteen) Wheeler Truck of Tata
Company bearing, Reg. No.
Patna High Court CWJC No.10622 of 2025 dt.01-08-2025
2/3
BR06GD3725, Chesis No.
MAT541109J1N33 779 Engine No.
ISB59B4S180T181L63743719 which is
seized in connection with Sindhwaliya
P.S. Case No. 343 of 2024, dt.
7.12.2024
, U/S 318(4)/336(2)/336(3) of B.N.S. & Section 30 (a)/41(i) of Bihar Prohibition & Excise Amendment Act, 2022."
3. In support of the aforementioned relief, there is no
demand before the competent authority, in particularly, under Rule
12 A of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Rules, 2021 read with
amended sub-Rule 2 of Rule 12 A in the year 2022 and 2023.
In the absence of demand before the competent authority, the
instant writ petition filed for direction under Article 226 for a writ
of mandamus is not maintainable or it is premature. Accordingly,
the instant writ petition stands disposed of as premature.
4. Disposal of the present writ petition would not be a
hurdle for the petitioner to invoke remedy under Rule 12 A of
Bihar Prohibition and Excise Rules, 2021 including amended
provisions in the year 2022 and 2023. If such application is
submitted in the prescribed form before the competent authority,
the competent authority shall pass speaking order within a period
of two weeks from the date of receipt of such application.
Patna High Court CWJC No.10622 of 2025 dt.01-08-2025
5. If the confiscation proceedings of the subject matter
of vehicle has attained finality, in that event, petitioner is at liberty
to prefer an appeal before the appropriate authority.
(P. B. Bajanthri, J)
(S. B. Pd. Singh, J) GAURAV S./-
AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 06.08.2025 Transmission Date
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!