Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5018 Patna
Judgement Date : 27 October, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
REQUEST CASE No.49 of 2021
======================================================
M/s KPC Projects Limited, a registered company having its office at 1-2- 339/1, Street No.- 6, Gagan Mahal, Domalgurah, Hyderabad, erstwhile Andhra Pradesh, now Telangana, through its Project Manager, namely I. Kamisetty Veera Prasad, aged about 63 years, Son of Kamisetty Chinna Subbarayudu, Resident of 3/248-1 YMR Colony, Proddatur, Cuddapah, Police Station- Proddatur, Andhra Pradesh- 516360.
... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department of Building Construction, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Engineer-in-Chief-cum-Additional Commissioner-cum-Special Secretary, Department of Building Construction, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Chief Engineer, Department of Building Construction, Government of Bihar, Patna.
4. The Superintending Engineer, Construction Circle, Department of Building Construction, Government of Bihar, Patna.
5. The Executive Engineer, Construction Division No.1, Department of Building Construction, Government of Bihar, Patna.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate Mr. Rajeev Shekhar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Uday Shankar Sharan Singh, GP-19 Mr. U.B. Singh, AC to GP-19 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 27-10-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):-
"1. For appointment of a suitable Arbitrator by this Court to resolve the dispute between the parties in terms of the Arbitration clause of the agreement vide Agreement No. SBD-01/2010-11 dated 01.07.2010, 08F2/2015-16 dated 11.03.2016, 09F2/2015-16 dated 11.03.2016, Patna High Court REQ. CASE No.49 of 2021 dt.27-10-2021
supplementary to the main agreement no.
02SBD/2016-17 dated 24.08.2016 and
SBD01/2018-19 dated 12.05.2018 entered
between the parties."
Learned counsel for the petitioner invites attention
of this Court to the communication dated 3 rd of April, 2019,
addressed to the Superintending Engineer, Construction Circle,
Building Construction Department, Bailey Road, Patna
(Annexure-5); communication dated 24th of May, 2019,
addressed to The Chief Engineer (Patna) (Annexure-7);
communication dated 12th of October, 2019, addressed to the
Engineer-in-Chief, Building Construction Department, Patna
(Annexure-9).
Clause 25 of the agreement dated 1st of July, 2010
(Annexure-1) contains the arbitration clause. The petitioner has
fully exhausted the procedure stipulated therein.
Clause for arbitration stands invoked. However,
none of the authorities have taken any action. The dispute, civil
in nature, emanated from the agreement dated 1st of July, 2010
(Annexure-1), entered into between the petitioner and the
respondent.
Learned counsel for the parties jointly suggest the Patna High Court REQ. CASE No.49 of 2021 dt.27-10-2021
name of Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha, a former Judge
of this Court for appointment as an Arbitrator to adjudicate the
dispute between the parties.
There is no dispute about-(a) the legality, validity
and binding effect of the agreement dated 1st of July, 2010
(Annexure-1) entered into between the parties to the lis; (b)
the existence of arbitration clause contained therein; (c) the
existence of dispute(s) arising there from.
Parties mutually agree for appointment of an
Arbitrator. In fact, they themselves have suggested the name
of Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha, a former Judge of
this Court to adjudicate the disputes.
The dispute arises out of execution of Agreement
dated 1st of July, 2010 (Annexure-1). The agreement
contained an arbitration clause, whereby the parties agreed for
reference of the dispute inter se the parties, arising out of the
said agreement, for arbitration as per law.
There is no legal impediment in the adjudication
of the dispute by the learned Arbitrator.
As such, as jointly prayed for, Hon'ble Mr.
Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha, a former Judge of this Court is
appointed as learned Arbitrator to adjudicate all disputes Patna High Court REQ. CASE No.49 of 2021 dt.27-10-2021
arising out of agreement dated 1st of July, 2010 (Annexure-1)
entered into between the parties to the lis.
All pleas and issues raised, on merits, are left
open to be considered and decided by the learned Arbitrator.
Learned Arbitrator shall be entitled to fee as per
the Schedule of the Act.
Since the dispute arises out of an agreement of
the year 2010, the hearing be expedited.
Parties undertake to fully cooperate and not take
any unnecessary adjournment.
The proceedings, during the time of current
Pandemic- Covid-19 shall be conducted through digital mode,
unless the parties otherwise mutually agree to meet in person
i.e. physical mode.
It is expected of the learned Arbitrator to decide
the issues expeditiously.
Joint Registrar (List) is directed to communicate
the order to the learned Arbitrator.
Learned counsel for the parties also undertake to
communicate the order to the learned Arbitrator. In fact, they
volunteered to appear before him, through digital mode on
22nd of November, 2021 and apprise him of the passing of the Patna High Court REQ. CASE No.49 of 2021 dt.27-10-2021
order.
Parties shall file their statement of claims before
the learned Arbitrator on such date of hearing which he may
fix, as per mutual convenience.
The Request Petition stands disposed of in the
above terms.
Interlocutory Application(s), if any, shall stand
disposed of.
(Sanjay Karol, CJ)
P.K.P./Amrendra
AFR/NAFR
CAV DATE
Uploading Date 29.10.2021
Transmission Date
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!