Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vinay Kumar Srivastava vs The State Of Bihar Through The ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 4997 Patna

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4997 Patna
Judgement Date : 26 October, 2021

Patna High Court
Vinay Kumar Srivastava vs The State Of Bihar Through The ... on 26 October, 2021
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                   Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9002 of 2021
     ======================================================

Vinay Kumar Srivastava, Son of Late Dr. Saligram Srivastava Resident of Village - Barawan, P.O. - Barawan, P.S. - Mirganj, District- Jaunpur, Uttar Pradesh - 222143.

... ... Petitioner Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Secretary, Law Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5. The Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Patna, through the learned Registrar General.

6. The learned Registrar General, Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Patna.

7. The Accountant General, Mahalekhakar Bhawan, Veerchand Patel Path, Patna.

... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Kumar Kaushik, Advocate For the State : Mr. Suman Kumar Jha, AC to AAG-3 For the Accountant General : Mr. Rajnandan Pd., Advocate For the High Court : Mr. Satyabir Bharti, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN)

Date : 26-10-2021

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

counsel for the respondents.

2. The following reliefs as formulated by the petitioner

have been claimed in the writ petition-

"(i) For issuance of an order, direction, or a writ of certiorari for setting aside the pension payment order Patna High Court CWJC No.9002 of 2021 dt.26-10-2021

dated 11.04.2019 whereby and whereunder the pension of the writ petitioner has been revised and reduced from Rs. 21,845/- to Rs. 17,476/- in view of resolution of the Finance Department bearing Resolution No. 1529 dated 11.02.2019 which is inapplicable to the case of the petitioner who superannuated with effect from 21.10.2013 pursuant to the order dated 04.11.2013 passed by the Competent Authority whereby and whereunder, the petitioner was inflicted with the punishment of compulsory retirement from Bihar Sub-ordinate Judicial Service.

(ii) For issuance of an order, direction or a writ of mandamus for directing the respondent authorities to give effect to the pension payment order dated 15.12.2014 whereby and whereunder the pension of the petitioner was fixed in view of the resolution of the Finance Department bearing Resolution No. 11859 dated 28.12.2011 whereby and whereunder it was resolved that the pension of Judicial Officers shall be fixed on the basis of the average emoluments drawn by them during the last 10 months of their service.

(iii) For issuance of an order, direction or an appropriate writ for staying the operation of the impugned pension payment order dated 11.04.2019 by which the pension of the petitioner has been reduced, during the pendency of the present writ application".

3. The short facts of the case according to the

petitioner are that having been selected in the 24 th Judicial

Service (Junior Division) Competitive Examination, he was Patna High Court CWJC No.9002 of 2021 dt.26-10-2021

appointed as Munsif by Notification contained in Memo No. 8399

dated 06.09.1997 (Annexure-P1). A disciplinary proceeding was

initiated against the petitioner in which charges were proved

leading to punishment by way of compulsory retirement in terms

of letter dated 06.08.2013 and consequent Notification dated

04.10.2013 issued by the State Government (Annexure-P3).

Based on his last pay drawn, the petitioner's pension was fixed

on 15.12.2014 at Rs.21,845/- (Annexure-P7). Thereafter, the

petitioner's pension was reduced in terms of PPO dated

11.04.2019 from Rs.21,845/- to Rs.17476/- (Annexure-P8). The

petitioner represented in the office of the Accountant General as

well as in the Finance Department for restoring his pension

which was being paid to him before such reduction.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

pension has been reduced from Rs.21,845/- to Rs.17476/-

without issuance of any show cause notice in this regard. It is

further stated that pursuant to his representation, it has been

informed by letter dated 10.06.2020 by the Finance Department

(Annexure-P10A) that such deduction has been made in the light

of its clarificatory resolution dated 11.02.2019 (Annexure-P10B).

A statement is made at the Bar on instruction that the petitioner

continues to be paid his pension on the basis of the earlier PPO

dated 15.12.2014 at Rs. 21,845/- (Annexure-P7). The fresh PPO Patna High Court CWJC No.9002 of 2021 dt.26-10-2021

on the basis of reduced pension through recovery of the excess

payment may be implemented at any time.

5. Learned counsel for the State and the High Court

appear and have been heard. It is submitted that the writ petition

is premature as on the own saying of the petitioner, no recovery

is being made from the petitioner at present and pension is being

paid without any deduction. It is further pointed out that the

representation of the petitioner has also not finally been rejected

as is evident from the aforesaid letter dated 10.06.2020

(Annexure-P10). It is also pointed out that fixation of reduced

pension itself has not been questioned by the petitioner as being

incorrectly computed.

6. Having heard the parties and on a consideration of

materials on record, we are of the view that the ends of justice

will be met by granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh

representation before Principal Secretary, Finance Department,

Govt. of Bihar, Patna (Respondent No. 3) for redressal of his

grievance, within a period of four weeks from today. If any such

representation is filed within the aforesaid period, the same shall

be considered and disposed of on its own merits in accordance

with law and after grant of an opportunity of hearing to the

petitioner, expeditiously and in any event preferably within a

period of twelve weeks thereafter.

Patna High Court CWJC No.9002 of 2021 dt.26-10-2021

7. The writ petition stands disposed of with the

aforesaid observations and directions.

(Vikash Jain, J)

( Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) V.K.Pandey/-

AFR/NAFR                N.A.F.R.
CAV DATE                N.A.
Uploading Date          28.10.2021
Transmission Date       N.A.
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter