Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Lakshmi Devi vs The Union Of India Through The ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 4949 Patna

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4949 Patna
Judgement Date : 21 October, 2021

Patna High Court
Lakshmi Devi vs The Union Of India Through The ... on 21 October, 2021
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9819 of 2021
     ======================================================

Lakshmi Devi, aged abut 56 years, female, Wife of Late Rajendra Prasad Resident of Mohalla- Kharkhura, P.S.- Delha, District- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

1. The Union of India through the Chairman Railway Board, New Delhi.

2. The Zonal Manager, E.C. Railway, Hajipur.

3. The D.R.M., Mugalsarai (Now Din Dayal Upadhyay) E.C. Railway, Din Dayal Upadhyay.

4. The Divisional Personnel Officer E.C. Railway, Din Dayal Upadhyay (Mugalsarai).

5. The Assistant Personnel Officer D.R.M. Office, Din Dayal Upadhyay, E.C.

Railway, Mugalsarai (Din Dayal Upadhyay).

6. The District Magistrate, Gaya.

7. The Superintendent of Police, Gaya.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Dr. K. N. Singh ( ASG ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI)

Date : 21-10-2021

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for

the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner hereby

undertakes to remove all defects pointed out by the Stamp

Reporter as and when required. It is accordingly directed that all

defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter be removed within one

month hereof.

2. In the instant writ petition, the petitioner has assailed

the order dated 28.08.2018 passed in O.A. No. 050/00317/17 by Patna High Court CWJC No.9819 of 2021 dt.21-10-2021

the Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench, Patna (in short

"CAT").

3. The petitioner claims that she is the legally wedded

wife of late Rajendra Prasad, an ex-Assistant Loco Pilot working

under SE (Loco)/EC Railway, Gaya, who was compulsorily retired

from service with effect from 22.03.2010. Thereafter, he died on

25.11.2015. After the death of late Rajendra Prasad, the petitioner,

claiming to be the legally wedded wife of late Rajendra Prasad,

approached the Railway authority for grant of family pension. It

was not considered therefore the petitioner was compelled to

approach CAT. CAT dismissed the O.A. No. 050/00317/17 on

28.08.2018. Hence this petition.

4. Undisputedly, there is no material information in

respect of the petitioner Lakshmi Devi being nominee of late

Rajendra Prasad so as to release family pension. From perusal of

the record, it is evident that there is some dispute relating to

legally wedded wife of late Rajendra Prasad. In such

circumstances, the petitioner Lakshmi Devi is required to obtain a

decree/declaration from the competent court to the effect that she

is the legally wedded wife of late Rajendra Prasad. In absence of

any material information on behalf of the petitioner to the extent

that her name is reflected in the nomination paper or in the service Patna High Court CWJC No.9819 of 2021 dt.21-10-2021

book as legally wedded wife of late Rajendra Prasad, petitioner is

not entitled to relief sought before the CAT. The status of legally

wedded wife is under dispute, therefore there is no infirmity or

error in the order dated 28.08.2018 passed by the CAT, Patna. That

apart, writ Court would not interfere in matters involving disputed

factual aspects.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed,

reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach appropriate forum

for seeking declaration that she is the legally wedded wife of late

Rajendra Prasad, an ex-Employee of the Railway.

6. Office shall follow-up to ensure that all defects are

removed and compliance with the notices of this Court are made

by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided in para 1

hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice

of this Court.

(Vikash Jain, J)

( P. B. Bajanthri, J) rishi/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          26.10.2021
Transmission Date
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter