Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1614 Patna
Judgement Date : 22 March, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No 1392 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-35 Year-2020 Thana- BARAULI District- Gopalganj
======================================================
ANKIT PATEL @ ANKIT KUMAR PATEL @ ANKIT KUMAR S/o Jai Kumar Patel R/o village- Kund Supauli, P.S.- Sidhwaliya, District- Gopalganj. At present Resident of Devapur, P.S.- Barauli, District- Gopalganj
... ... Appellant/s Versus The State of Bihar
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr Lokesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.A.G.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 22-03-2021
Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the learned
counsel for the State.
2 The appellant has preferred the present Appeal under
Section 101 (5) of Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children)
Act, 2015 (for brevity, the Act) against the refusal of his prayer for
regular bail vide order dated 01.12.2020 passed by Additional
Sessions Judge I -cum- Special Judge (Children Act), Gopalganj in
a case registered under Sections 302, 201/34 of Indian Penal Code
in connection with Barauli Police Station (for brevity, PS) Case No
35 of 2020.
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1392 of 2021 dt.22-03-2021
3 The allegation is that the victim has been found
hanging within the school premises and her hands and arms were
tied. The prosecution parties have later on discovered the initials
AP written in her exercise book and have, accordingly, implicated
the instant appellant (Ankit Patel).
4 It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant
that the appellant's implication, based on the initials found in the
victim's exercise book, is clearly unsustainable and against the
law. The appellant, being juvenile, has been implicated on the
basis of his own confessional statement. The investigation reveals
that one suicide note has also been recovered. The appellant was
extended leave after his arrest for the period 28.03.2020 to
13.10.2020 when he has not misused the privilege of leave. Apart
from this period, he has been in custody since 12.02.2020. The
submission is that the report of the Probationary Officer/Social
Investigation Report also does not bring on record any reason as
contemplated under the proviso to Section 12 of the Act, justifying
rejection of the appellant's prayer for bail. The order rejecting the
appellant's prayer for bail is clearly unsustainable.
5 In my opinion, a case for grant of regular bail is made
out. The impugned order dated 01.12.2020 requires interference
by this Court, which is, accordingly, set aside. Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1392 of 2021 dt.22-03-2021
6 Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer
for bail. It is submitted that the appellant has confessed his guilt
before the police and the initial AP tallies with his name Ankit
Patel and since such initials have been found in the exercise note
book of the victim and it has come in the investigation that they
were on friendly terms, there are sufficient materials to implicate
the appellant in the instant case.
7 Having considered the rival submissions, this Court
would observe that the conditions contemplated under the proviso
to Section 12 of the Act do not exist so as to justify the appellant's
any further detention.
8 Accordingly, this appeal is allowed. The impugned
order dated 01.12.2020 passed by Additional Sessions Judge I
-cum- Special Judge (Children Act), Gopalganj in connection with
Barauli PS Case No 35 of 2020 is set aside.
9 Let the appellant above named be released on bail on
his furnishing bonds of Rs 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with
two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of
Additional Sessions Judge I -cum- Special Judge (Children Act),
Gopalganj in Barauli PS Case No 35 of 2020 subject to the
following conditions:
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1392 of 2021 dt.22-03-2021
(1) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the
appellant who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he
is related with the appellant. The bailor will also undertake to
inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the
appellant.
(2) That the appellant will be well represented on each
date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will
be liable to be cancelled.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J) M.E.H./-
AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 23.03.2021 Transmission Date 23.03.2021
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!