Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3637 Patna
Judgement Date : 22 July, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11532 of 2021
======================================================
Ranjit Kumar Kushwaha Son of Tejnarayan Gupta Resident of Baijnathpur, Ward No. - 2, P.S. - Bihariganj, District- Madhepura.
... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Excise Department, Bihar, Patna.
2. The Excise Commissioner, Bihar, Patna.
3. The Collector Cum District Magistrate, Purnea.
4. The Superintendent of Police, Purnea.
5. The Excise Superintendent, Purnea.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Praveen Kumar Agrawal, Advocate Mr. Santosh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vikash Kumar S.C. 11 ====================================================== (The proceedings of the Court are being conducted through Video Conferencing and the Advocates joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residence.)
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR)
Date : 22-07-2021
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioner has prayed for following relief(s):-
(i) "For quashing the order dated 05.02.2021 passed by the learned Excise Commissioner, Bihar, Patna in Excise Appeal No. 45 of 2021 whereby the order of confiscation passed by the Ld. Collector, Purnea dated 20.10.2020 in Excise Case No. 319/2020 has been affirmed and appeal filed by petitioner was dismissed.
(ii) For quashing the order dated 20.10.2020 passed by the Ld. Collector, Purnea in Excise Case No. 319/2020 whereby the motorcycle of the petitioner bearing No. BR 43T-4108 seized in connection with Barhara (Raghubansh Nagar) P.S. Case No. 160/2020 has been confiscated.
Patna High Court CWJC No.11532 of 2021 dt.22-07-2021
(iii) For a direction to the respondents to release the Motorcycle BR 43T-4108 in favour of the petitioner .
And for any other relief(s) for which the petitioner is found to be entitled in the facts and circumstances of the case."
Petitioner has approached this Court without availing
the statutory remedy of revision against the impugned appellate
order, as such, liberty is granted to petitioner to file revision
against the appellate order before the Revisional Authority and
if any such Revision is filed within 8 weeks, then Revisional
Authority shall condone the delay in filing the revision petition
and shall decide the revision petition preferably within 8 weeks
from the date of its filing on its own merit.
During pendency of revision petition, confiscated
vehicle shall not be auction sold, if not auction sold.
With aforesaid liberty, the writ petition is disposed of.
(Sanjay Karol, CJ)
( S. Kumar, J) veena/-
AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date Transmission Date NA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!