Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ajay Yadav vs The State Of Bihar
2021 Latest Caselaw 3367 Patna

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3367 Patna
Judgement Date : 15 July, 2021

Patna High Court
Ajay Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 15 July, 2021
    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No 2331 of 2021
    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-77 Year-2020 Thana- KHUDAGANJ District- Nalanda
======================================================

AJAY YADAV Son of Rambhawan Yadav Resident of Village - Khudaganj, P.S.- Khudaganj, District - Nalanda.

... ... Appellant/s Versus The State of Bihar

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr Anil Kumar No 1, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr Sadanand Paswan, Special PP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD

ORAL JUDGMENT

Date : 15-07-2021

This case has been listed today for consideration through

Video Conferencing.

2 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the

learned Special Public Prosecutor (Special PP) for the State.

3 The appellant has preferred the present Appeal under

Section 14 - A (2) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes

(Prevention of Atrocities) Act (for brevity, SC/ST Act) against the

refusal of his prayer for regular bail vide order dated 21.02.2021

passed by Additional Sessions Judge I -cum- Special Judge, Bihar

Sharif, Nalanda in a case registered under Sections 302/34 of

Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 (i) (r) (s) of SC/ST Act in Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2331 of 2021 dt.15-07-2021

connection with Khudaganj Police Station (for brevity, PS) Case

No 77 of 2020.

4 After the recovery of dead body of her husband from

the river, the informant has lodged the First Information Report

(for brevity, FIR) raising suspicion against the appellant, co-

accused Vijay Yadav and Sanjay Yadav of having killed her

husband. FIR narrates that earlier in the day, the husband of the

informant had an altercation with the instant appellant. In the

evening, he had left the house but did not return.

5 Learned counsel for the appellant submits that from

the prosecution case, it is evident that FIR is based merely on

suspicion. The other co-accused Vijay Yadav and Sanjay Yadav

have been allowed bail by the lower Court itself. Appellant has no

criminal antecedent and charge sheet has been submitted. He

continues to be in custody since 09.12.2020. Further submission is

that from the case diary also, no material has surfaced to draw any

distinction between the instant appellant and co-accused Vijay

Yadav and Sanjay Yadav who have already been allowed bail by

the lower Court itself.

6 Learned Special PP has opposed the prayer for bail.

He, however, is not in a position to dispute the submission of the Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2331 of 2021 dt.15-07-2021

appellant's counsel that the case of the appellant is based on

priority with other co-accused persons.

7 In my opinion, in view of nature of accusation in the

FIR, and submission of parties, a case for grant of regular bail is

made out. The impugned order dated 21.02.2021 requires

interference by this Court, which is, accordingly, set aside.

8 This appeal is allowed. The impugned order dated

21.02.2021 passed by Additional Sessions Judge I -cum- Special

Judge, Biharsharif in connection with Khudaganj PS Case No 77

of 2020 is set aside.

9 Let the appellant above named be released on bail on

his furnishing bonds of Rs 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with

two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

Additional Sessions Judge I -cum- Special Judge, Biharsharif in

Khudaganj PS Case No 77 of 2020 subject to the following

conditions:

(1) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the

appellant who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he

is related with the appellant. The bailor will also undertake to

inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the

appellant.

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2331 of 2021 dt.15-07-2021

(2) That the appellant will be well represented on each

date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will

be liable to be cancelled.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) M.E.H./-

AFR/NAFR                  NAFR
CAV DATE                    NA
Uploading Date          17.07.2021
Transmission Date       17.07.2021
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter