Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vishwajit Kumar vs The State Of Bihar
2021 Latest Caselaw 47 Patna

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 47 Patna
Judgement Date : 6 January, 2021

Patna High Court
Vishwajit Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 6 January, 2021
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7908 of 2020
     ======================================================

Vishwajit Kumar S/o Rajendra Prasad, Resident of Village and P.O. - Nanan Nanand, P.S. - Silao, District- Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Home (Police ) Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Additional Chief Secretary, Home (Police ) Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna.

4. The Inspector General of Police, Muzaffarpur Zone, District - Muzaffarpur.

5. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Saran Range, District- Chapra.

6. The Deputy Inspector General of Police (Personnel), Bihar, Patna.

7. The Superintendent of Police, District- Gopalganj.

8. The Superintendent of Police, District- Saran.

9. The Sergeant Major-cum-Conducting Officer, Police Kendra Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

     For the Petitioner/s   :       Mr.Y.V. Giri (Sr. Advocate) with
                            :       Mr.Sanjay Kumar Giri
     For the Respondent/s   :       Mr.Manish Kumar (GP 4) with Mr. Ravi Verma

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 06-01-2021

The petitioner has challenged an order dated 12.06.2020

passed by the Director General-cum-Inspector General of Police,

Bihar issued vide Memo No. 1064 dated 15.06.2020 whereby

exercising revisional powers under Rule 853 A (a) of the Bihar

Police Manual, he has imposed punishment of dismissal from Patna High Court CWJC No.7908 of 2020 dt.06-01-2021

service on the petitioner, who was at the relevant point of time,

was posted in Gopalganj Town police station as a Constable.

2. An order passed on the same date dated 15.06.2020,

in respect of one Ananjay Singh @ Ananjay Kumar Singh has

been set aside by an order passed today in C.W.J.C. No. 7906 of

2020. This matter also relates to the occurrence, which had taken

place on 16.08.2016 in Khajuria village under Gopalganj (Town

Police station) in which 16 persons had died because of

consumption of spurious liquor. Identical allegations were made

against this petitioner in the charge memo dated 07.02.2017 with

the same set of evidence, as was the case in the matter of Ananjay

Kumar Singh (supra). In case of this petitioner also, the Enquiring

Authority recorded in the enquiry report, the finding that the

allegation against the petitioner stood proved. According to the

Enquiring Authority, the defence of the petitioner that while posted

as a Constable in the Police Station, was unaware of the ongoing

trade of illicit liquor in a nearby village was not 'digestible' to him.

In the petitioner's case also, the Superintendent of Police had

imposed punishment of two black marks having the effect of

stoppage of one increment with cumulative effect. In identical

situation, the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Saran had

referred the matter to the Police Headquarters with his Patna High Court CWJC No.7908 of 2020 dt.06-01-2021

recommendation that the punishment imposed on him was not

befitting the gravity of charge levelled against him. It can be easily

discerned that the Director General-cum-Inspector General of

Police has passed stereotype order in the present case also without

discussing the petitioner's reply to the show cause notice, which

was issued to him before passing of the impugned order.

3. In identical circumstance by an order dated

06.01.2021 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 7906 of 2020 (Ananjay Kumar

Singh) (supra) this Court has quashed an order passed by the

Director General-cum-Inspector General of Police. Accordingly,

the order under challenge in the present writ application issued

vide Memo No. 1064 dated 15.06.2020 is also quashed. The

petitioner is directed to be reinstated forthwith. All consequences

of quashing of the impugned order shall follow and accordingly

the petitioner is directed to be reinstated forthwith. It is held that

he shall be entitled to the full salary and other emoluments for the

period during which he remained out of service because of the

illegal order passed by the Director General-cum-Inspector

General of Police.

4. For the same reasons discussed in the order dated

06.01.2021 passed in Ananjay Kumar Singh (supra), this

application is allowed. Reasons assigned in the said order for Patna High Court CWJC No.7908 of 2020 dt.06-01-2021

interfering with the impugned order shall form part of the present

order.

5. All orders consequential to the impugned order dated

15.06.2020 stand quashed.

6. This application is allowed.

7. There shall be no order as to costs.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J)

AKASH/-

AFR/NAFR
CAV DATE                06.01.2021
Uploading Date
Transmission Date
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter