Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bibi Nurjahan vs The State Of Bihar And Ors
2021 Latest Caselaw 431 Patna

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 431 Patna
Judgement Date : 28 January, 2021

Patna High Court
Bibi Nurjahan vs The State Of Bihar And Ors on 28 January, 2021
           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                     Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1662 of 2019
      ======================================================

Bibi Nurjahan, female, aged about 60 years, wife of late Md. Nazimuddin, resident of village- Salempur, Post Office- Mohiuddinpur, Police Station- Jagdishpur, District- Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary (Education), Department of Human Resources Development, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Magistrate, Bhagalpur.

4. The Regional Education Deputy Director, Bhagalpur Division, Bhagalpur.

5. The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Education Department, Bhagalpur.

6. The Block Education Officer, Nathnagar, Bhagalpur.

7. The Treasury Officer, Bhagalpur.

8. The Accountant General, Bihar, Birchand Patel Marg, Patna.

9. The Circle Officer, Jagdishpur Anchal Jagdishpur, District- Bhagalpur.

10. Gulnaz Bano, wife of late Md. Nazimuddin, resident of village- Salempur, Post office- Mohammadinpur, Police Station- Jagdishpur, District- Bhagalpur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Najmul Hodda, Advocate For the State : Mr. Mukund Mohan Jha, AC to GP 27 For the Accountant General : Mr. Vivek Anand Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent No.10 : Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 28-01-2021

Heard Mr. Md. Najmul Hodda, learned counsel for the

petitioner; Mr. Mukund Mohan Jha, learned AC to GP 27 for the

State, Mr. Vivek Anand Kumar, learned counsel for the

Accountant General and Mr. Praveen Kumar, learned counsel

for the respondent no. 10.

Patna High Court CWJC No.1662 of 2019 dt.28-01-2021

2. The petitioner has moved the Court for the

following reliefs:

"I. For issuance of a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondent authorities for grant of full family pension in favour of the petitioner as her husband died during the tenure of his service and she is legal 1st wife of the deceased employee namely Md. Nazimuddin whereas 2nd wife private respondent no. 10 Gulnaz Bano already is in govt. service on the post of regular Assistant Teacher.

II. For issuance of a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction commanding the respondents authorities to pay death cum retiral dues in favour of the petitioner as per the rule.

III. For any other appropriate relief or reliefs for which the petitioner may deemed entitle."

3. The matter has been adjourned for time to time and

many affidavits have been filed by the parties. Ultimately, the

Court finds that on the part of the petitioner as well as the

respondent no. 10, there have been instances where both have

not correctly stated the facts before various authorities for

taking benefits, like widow pension and policy with the Life

Insurance Corporation of India. In such background, the Court

in its extraordinary, prerogative and discretionary jurisdiction

under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is unable to come

to a definite conclusion, based on facts, with regard to the legal Patna High Court CWJC No.1662 of 2019 dt.28-01-2021

position of the parties.

4. Thus, in the considered opinion of the Court, the

stand of the authorities that both the parties may go before the

Civil Court of competent jurisdiction to get a declaration with

regard to their entitlement and proportion of the death-cum-

retiral benefits of late Md. Nazimuddin, who died working on

the post of the Assistant Teacher.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed off

with liberty to the parties to move before the Civil Court of

competent jurisdiction with regard to declaration of their right

as well as share in the death-cum-retiral benefits of late Md.

Nazimuddin.

6. The authorities would be required to act in terms of

the order of the Court in such proceeding.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)

J. Alam/-

AFR/NAFR U T

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter