Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6418 Patna
Judgement Date : 23 December, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18783 of 2021
======================================================
Md. Mangaru Alam @ Md. Mangaru Son of Ramjani Miyan Resident of Village- Vishunganj, P.S.- Jehanabad, District- Jehanabad.
... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Excise Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2. The District Magistrate, Jehanabad.
3. The Senior Deputy Collector, District Jehanabad.
4. The Station House Officer-Cum- S.I., Police Station, Paras Bigaha, District-
Jehanabad.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Md. Jubair Ansari, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Kumar Manish (S.C.5) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR)
Date : 23-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioner has prayed for following relief(s):-
i) To quash the impugned order contain in vide memo no. 681/law Jehanabad dated 13.04.2021 passed by the Court of the Senior Deputy Collector, Collectoriate Jehanabad in confiscation Case No. 88/D.M./ 2018 Govt. Versus Md. Mangaru So far its relates to the petitioner whereby and whereunder petitioner vehicle Tempo bearing Registration No. BR- 25A-9617 has confiscated and ordered to confiscate for auction public in favour Government of Bihar. (Aznexure-4).
ii) Further to direct the respondents authorities to release the seized vehicle Patna High Court CWJC No.18783 of 2021 dt.23-12-2021
tempo bearing Registration No. BR-25A- 9617 to its original owner i.e. the petitioner.
iii) For any other appropriate relief(s) as per facts and circumstances of this case petitioner to be entitled as your lordships."
Petitioner has approached this Court without
exhausting the statutory remedy of appeal against the impugned
order, as such, petitioner is granted liberty to avail the remedy of
appeal against the confiscation order passed by the Confiscating
Authority- cum- District Magistrate, before the Appellate
Authority and if any such appeal is filed within 4 weeks then
appellate authority shall condone the delay in filing the appeal
and shall decide the appeal on its own merit preferably within 8
weeks from the date of its filing.
During pendency of appeal, the confiscated vehicle
shall not be auction sold, if not already auction sold.
With aforesaid liberty, the writ petition is disposed
of.
(Sanjay Karol, CJ)
( S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/veena-
AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!