Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sanmani Kumbhar @ Sanamani vs State Of Odisha
2026 Latest Caselaw 3080 Ori

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 3080 Ori
Judgement Date : 31 March, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Orissa High Court

Sanmani Kumbhar @ Sanamani vs State Of Odisha on 31 March, 2026

                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
                                 CRLMP No. 307 of 2026
             Sanmani Kumbhar @ Sanamani                 ....             Petitioner
             Bichhi

                                                        Mr. Sougat Dash, Advocate
                                           -versus-
              1. State of Odisha
              2. The Superintendent of Police,
                 Rourkela
              3. The IIC, Bramhani Tarang               ....       Opposite Parties
                 Police Station, Rourkela
                                                       Mr. Sarathi Jyoti Mohanty,
                                                      Additional Standing Counsel
            CORAM:
              THE HON'BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
                                           ORDER

31.03.2026 Order No.

02. (Through hybrid mode)

1. This CRLMP has been filed with the prayer for transfer of

the investigation of Brahmani Tarang P.S. Case No.242 of 2022 by

any other independent agency for fair investigation and for the

greater interest of justice.

2. By order dated 12.03.2026, the matter had been adjourned

to today to enable Mr. S.K. Rout, learned Additional Standing

Counsel to obtain instructions along with the copy of the up-to-date

case diary.

3. The instructions along with the case diary are produced for

perusal of this Court. On instructions it has been specifically stated

in paragraphs 7, 8 and 9 which are relevant are quoted below:

"7. That during the investigation of the case and its supervision made by then SDPO, по evidence regarding any kidnapping or trafficking of Muni Kumbhar could substantiated. The Supervising Officer has clearly reflected the same in her Supervision Note dated 29.01.2023.

8. That as of date, the FIR mentioned persons namely Anna @ Hana Kerketta, her brother Nicolash Kerketta and Sylvester Kujur have been interrogated, and all known associates and social media connections and the victim have been examined, but nothing evidence has come against them.

9. That from the invstigation it came to light that victim women Muni@Menaka Kumbhar, D/o Mangra Kumbhar, AT-Badmaren, PS-B.tarang, dist-Sundargarh was not kidnapped by FIR alleged person but she had been to New delhi in the year 2003 with one Ana Kerketa@Ahana(45), W/O Ajit Lakra, At-Sewaibel Tola, PS-Simdega, Dist-Simdega, Jharkhanda, At/Pr Qtr No- 28, Karalbag, near S park, PS-Karalbag, Delhi for working as a domestic help. Victim was engaged in New Delhi through one Tribal Placemen Service agency. She was in contact with her family members till 2018 as

mentioned by the Petitioner (complainant) in CONTC No -6740/ 2024 filed before the Hon'ble High Court of Odisha, Cuttack. It is ascertained from the investigation that she did not contact her family members after 2018, As such it was not case of kidnapping, rather a case of missing from New Delhi. Accordingly Brahamani tarang P.S. Case No-242 of 2022 was returned as FR Mistake of Law and the FF was submitted accordingly vide No- 475 on dt. 12.11.2025 after obtaining order from the S.P. Rourkela. The Honb'le Court of J.M.F.C. (R), Rourkela has accepted the FF dt. 15.11.2025. The allegation of the Petition is devoid of merit."

4. As the incident relates to the year 2004 and perusal of the

case diary reveals that the complainant as well as the parents of the

victim girl, namely, Mangra Kumbhar as well as Tara Kumbhar have

been examined on 19.12.2022 and final report, Mistake of Law has

been submitted on 12.11.2025 which has been accepted by the

learned JMFC(R), Rourkela, the CRLMP is disposed of granting

liberty to the Petitioner to avail the remedy which is available to her

under law.

5. Mr. Dash, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that

neither has the Petitioner been informed about filing of the final

report nor has she received any notice from the learned JMFC(R),

Rourkela before the final form was accepted.

6. It is open to the Petitioner to bring this to the notice of the

concerned Court that she has not been informed about filing of final

report nor has she received notice before the final report was

accepted.

(Savitri Ratho) Judge RKS

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter