Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2870 Ori
Judgement Date : 25 March, 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.8596 OF 2026
Rabi Narayan Mandal .... Petitioner
Mr. Amiya Kumar Mishra, Advocate
-versus-
The Tahasildar, Nischintakoili and .... Opp. Parties
Others
Mr. Siba Narayan Biswal,
Additional Standing Counsel
Mr. Bipin Kumar Nayak, Advocate
(for Commissioner of Endowments)
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
ORDER
Order No. 25.03.2026 02. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Mr. Bipin Kumar Nayak, learned counsel entered appearance on behalf of Opposite Party Nos.16 to 18 by filing Vakalatnama in Court today, which is taken on record.
3. Grievance of the Petitioner, in this writ petition, is with regard to the order No.3259 dated 13th March, 2026 (Annexure-19) issued by the Commissioner of Endowments, Odisha, Bhubaneswar in appointing an Interim Trust Board of Shree Raghunath Jew bije Kentalo, P.O. Asureswar under Nischintakoili Tahasil in the district of Cuttack (for brevity 'the Deity').
4. The Petitioner, more particularly, raises grievance with regard to inclusion of name of Sri Prakash Chandra Sahoo (Opposite
Party No.6) and Sri Kishore Kumar Routray (Opposite Party No.15) as the members of the Interim Trust Board.
4.1. It is submitted by Mr. Mishra, learned counsel for the Petitioner that there are several allegations against Sri Prakash Chandra Sahoo (Opposite Party No.16) for non-submission of accounts of the Deity especially the money collected for Sri Ram Navami Yatra. He drew attention of this Court to the information obtained under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (for brevity, 'the Act, 2005) on 14th November, 2025 under Annexure-6. It is stated that the erstwhile Managing Trustee, namely, Prakash Chandra Sahoo, who was in-charge of the Deity during period from 2017-18 to 2024-225 had not submitted the income and expenditure statement through budget proposal as a result of which it was not possible on the part of the Office of the Additional Assistant Commissioner of Endowments, Cuttack to provide required information as sought for. He also drew attention to the information received under the Act, 2005 stating the irregularities committed by Sri Prakash Chandra Sahoo (Opposite Party No.6) in the capacity of Managing Trustee.
4.2. It is further submitted that the Inspector of Endowments, Jagatsinghpur submitted his report No.289 dated 7th July, 2025 (Annexure-10) to the Additional Assistant Commissioner of Endowments, Cuttack stating as under:-
"As regards to allegations made regarding non- reflecting a sum of Rupees Twenty Lakhs in the cash book of the institution, which was collected for the purpose of Ramanavami Yatra. In this context upon enquiry and on being asked to the M.T., he told that although the said amount has not been taken in the cash book but the amount
collected for the said purpose has been made properly with maintaining separate Register. I also verified the same and found that no such amount has been spent improperly. To ascertain the genuineness of income and expenditure steps may kindly be taken for conduct of audit."
In that regard, the Petitioner being a person having interest also made a prayer before the Commissioner of Endowments to take necessary action.
4.3. Mr. Mishra, learned counsel for the Petitioner also drew attention to Annexure-21 filed along with the affidavit 23rd March, 2026 whereby said Prakash Chandra Sahoo styling himself as the Managing Trustee of the Deity, distributed invitation card for the ensuing Ramanavami Yatra in spite of the order dated 13th March, 2026 under Annexure-19 appointing Tahasildar, Nischintakoili as the Interim Managing Trustee of the Deity. The said invitation card stated to have been distributed with effect from 21st March, 2026. He further submits that there are several other allegations of mismanagement against Sri Prakash Chandra Sahoo (Opposite Party No.16). Hence, he should be restrained from managing the ensuing Ramanavami Yatra scheduled to commence from 27th March, 2026.
5. Mr. Nayak, learned counsel for the Commissioner of Endowments submits that he has no instruction as to whether Commissioner of Endowments had taken any step pursuant to the application submitted by the Petitioner on 20th March, 2026 to direct the Inspector of Endowments, Jagatsinghpur (in-charge), Cuttack to handover the institution to the Tahasildar, Nischintakoili for smooth conduct of the ensuing Ramanavami festival. He, however, submits that there is no illegality in the order under Annexure-19.
6. Mr. Biswal, learned Additional Standing Counsel places on record the written instruction imparted by the Tahasildar, Nischintakoili vide letter No. 1189 dated 24th March, 2026. The relevant portion of the written instruction is reproduced herein below:-
"I. That in pursuance of Order No.3259 dated 13.03.2026 issued by the Commissioner of Endowments, Odisha, Bhubaneswar the undersigned has been appointed as the Interim Managing Trustee of Shree Raghunath Jew Temple, Kentalo, along with 14 others members including the BDO, Nischintakoili and the IIC, Nischintakoili Police Station. It is submitted that subsequent to the aforesaid order, the undersigned has formally assumed charge from the Ex-Managing Trustee, Sri Prakash Chandra Sahoo in accordance with due procedure.
II. That Sri Ram Navami, being the principal festival of the deity, is scheduled to commence from 27.03.2026 (Friday). Considering the significance of the festival and the large congregation of devotees, the period immediately following the assumption of charge is highly sensitive and requires careful administrative handling to ensure smooth conduct of rituals and maintenance of law and order.
III. That immediately after assumption of charge, a preparatory meeting was convened on 17.03.2026 with all stakeholders for the smooth and orderly conduct of Sri Ram Navami and Danda Yatra, and necessary arrangements have been initiated accordingly. The copy of the Letter No.1038 dt. 17.03.2026 is enclosed as Annexure-A."
8. He, therefore, submits that pursuant to order dated 13th March, 2026 (Anneuxre-19), the Tahasildar, Nischintakoili has already taken over the charge of the institution and will conduct Sri Ram Navami Yatra of the Deity in active cooperation of rest 14
members of the Interim Trust Board. Thus, he submits that the apprehension of the Petitioner is baseless.
9. Taking note of the submission made by learned counsel for the parties, this Court feels that the matter requires consideration, more particularly, with regard to inclusion of the name of Opposite Party No.6) in the Interim Trust Board.
10. Hence, issue notice to the Opposite Parties along with the affidavit dated 23rd March, 2026 filed by the Petitioner.
11. Since Mr. Biswal, learned Additional Standing Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the Opposite Party Nos.1,2 and 3, no requisites need be filed for issuance of notice to them.
12. Mr. Bipin Kumar Nayak, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of Opposite Party Nos.16, 17 and 18. Hence, no notice need be issued to them. Two extra copies of the writ petition shall be served on Mr. Nayak, learned counsel appearing for Opposite Party Nos.16 to 18 to take instruction in the matter and file counter affidavit.
13. Requisites for issuance of notice to Opposite Party Nos.4 to 15 by Speed Post with A.D. shall be filed by 30th March, 2026.
14. Put up this matter on 20th May, 2026 along with tracking report of the Postal Department.
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
(S.K. Mishra) Judge
03. 1. Issue notice as above. Accept one set of process fee.
2. In the facts and circumstances stated above, more particularly, taking into consideration that there are materials on record prima facie suggesting mismanagement of Sri Prakash Chandra Sahoo in the capacity of erstwhile Managing Trustee of the Deity Shree Raghunath Jew bije Kentalo, P.O. Asureswar under Nischintakoili Tahasil in the district of Cuttack, he is restrained to take part in managing the affairs of the ensuing Sri Ram Navami Yatra of the Deity scheduled to commence from 27th March, 2026.
2.1. The Tahasildar, Nischintakoili with the aid and cooperation of the Inspector of Endowments, Jagatsinghpur and other members of the Interim Trust Board (except Sri Prakash Chandra Sahoo- Oppsoite Party No.6) shall smoothly conduct the ensuing Sri Ram Navami Yatra of the Deity. The Opposite Parties may file their objection to the I.A. within a period of two weeks hence serving copy thereof on learned counsel for the Petitioner and rest of the Opposite Parties.
3. Issue urgent certified copy of this order on proper application.
(K.R. Mohapatra)
Judge
Digitally Signed (S.K. Mishra)
Signed by: HIMANSU SEKHAR DASH
Reason: Authentication Judge
Location: OHC
Himansu
Date: 26-Mar-2026 12:58:27
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!