Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Biswajit Panda vs State Of Odisha & Anr. ....... Opposite ...
2026 Latest Caselaw 1989 Ori

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1989 Ori
Judgement Date : 6 March, 2026

[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Orissa High Court

Biswajit Panda vs State Of Odisha & Anr. ....... Opposite ... on 6 March, 2026

Author: Sanjeeb K Panigrahi
Bench: Sanjeeb K Panigrahi
                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
                                                  CRLMC No. 4929 of 2025

                             Biswajit Panda                              ........     Petitioner(s)
                                                                         Mr. Jyoti Ranjan Kar, Adv.
                                                         -Versus-
                             State of Odisha & Anr.                      ....... Opposite Party(s)
                                                                         Ms. PratyushaNaidu, Adv.
                                                                                       (for O.P.2)
                                     CORAM:
                                     DR. JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI

                                                    ORDER

06.03.2026 Order No.

04.

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.

2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed to

quash the execution proceeding as well as the order of

attachment dated 09.07.2025 passed by the learned Judge, Family

Court, Jajpur in Cr.P (Exn) Case No.136 of 2023.

3. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Opposite

Party No.2/Informant has filed a petition under Section 125 of

Cr.P.C. before the learned Judge, Family Court, Jajpur, against the

Petitioner vide Cr.P. Case No.47 of 2018, which was allowed vide

the ex parte order dated 25.11.2019 directing the Petitioner to pay

Rs. 8000/- per month as interim maintenance.

5. Learned counsel for Petitioner further contends that being

aggrieved by the said ex parte order, the Petitioner had filed a

revision case before this Court vide RPFAM Case No.15 of 2021

which was disposed of on 28.07.2022 with an observation that the

Petitioner may move an application under Section 126(2) Cr.P.C.

to get the order of ex parte set aside. He further submits that

based on the order dated 28.07.2022, the learned Judge, Family

Court had passed the final order directing the Petitioner to pay

Rs. 10,000/- per month for maintenance to the Opposite Party

No.2.

6. Learned counsel for the Petitioner further argues that challenging

the order of maintenance dated 04.09.2023 passed by the learned

Judge, Family Court, Jajpur in Cr.P. No.47 of 2018, the Petitioner

had filed CRLMP No.2013 of 2023 with a prayer to quash/modify

the aforesaid order dated 04.09.2023 and the learned court below

reviewed the order dated 04.09.2023 directing the Petitioner to

pay Rs.7,000/- per month to the Opposite Party No.2.

7. Learned counsel for the Petitioner further submits that before

passing of the revisional order dated 11.04.2024, the Opposite

Party No.2 has filed a petition under Section 125(3) of Cr.P.C. for

executing of the order of maintenance dated 04.09.2023 before the

learned Judge, Family Court, Jajpur and the learned Family Judge

passed the attachment order dated 9.07.2025 against the

Petitioner.

8. In such view of the matter, this Court directs the Petitioner to

approach the executing court with the revised order dated

11.04.2024 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Jajpur in

Criminal Proceeding No.47 of 2018. In such event, the executing

court shall look into the conduct of the Petitioner in so far as the

payment of the maintenance is concerned and pass appropriate

order. Accordingly, the order dated 09.07.2025 passed by the

learned Judge, Family Court, Jajpur in Cr. P.(Exn.) No.136 of 2023

is modified.

9. It is further directed that an amount Rs.60,000/- stated to have

been deposited by the Petitioner before the executing court shall

be released in favour of the Opposite Party No.2.

10.It is made clear that this Court does not express any opinion on

the merit of the execution proceeding.

11.Accordingly, the CRLMC is disposed of.

( Dr. Sanjeeb K Panigrahi) Judge Murmu

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter