Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Nalinikanta Mohapatra vs Smt. Salini Pandit .... Opposite ...
2026 Latest Caselaw 296 Ori

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 296 Ori
Judgement Date : 13 January, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Orissa High Court

Nalinikanta Mohapatra vs Smt. Salini Pandit .... Opposite ... on 13 January, 2026

Author: Sanjeeb K Panigrahi
Bench: Sanjeeb K Panigrahi
                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

                                               CONTC No.2228 of 2025

                           Nalinikanta Mohapatra          ....                Petitioner(s)
                                                               Mr. Kunja Sundar Das, Adv.

                                                        -versus-
                           Smt. Salini Pandit             ....           Opposite Party(s)
                                                                   Mr. Sonak Mishra, Adv.



                                   CORAM:
                                   HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI
                   Order                                 ORDER
                   No.                                  13.01.2026

06. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.

2. This CONTC arises out of the judgment/order dated

20.09.2022 passed in W.P.(C) No.8857 of 2021.

3. Heard learned counsel for the Parties.

4. At the outset, learned counsel for the Opposite

Party(s)/Contemnor(s), on instruction, submits that

challenging the judgment/order dated 20.09.2022 passed in

the above noted Writ Petition a Writ Appeal vide W.A.

No.1780 of 2022 has been preferred which is still pending

before the Division Bench of this Court.

5. In such view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to

Digitally Signed considering the submission of learned counsel for the

Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 15-Jan-2026 10:58:20

Petitioner, this Court directs the Petitioner to make an

attempt for early disposal of the above noted Writ Appeal.

6. It is also made clear that if the Petitioner so desires, he

may prefer a CONTC after disposal of the said Writ

Appeal.

7. This CONTC is, accordingly, disposed of being

dropped.

(Dr. Sanjeeb K Panigrahi) Judge Ayaskanta

Designation: Personal Assistant

Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 15-Jan-2026 10:58:20

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter