Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Swarnalata Biswal And Others vs Babuli Prusty & Others
2026 Latest Caselaw 149 Ori

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 149 Ori
Judgement Date : 8 January, 2026

[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Orissa High Court

Swarnalata Biswal And Others vs Babuli Prusty & Others on 8 January, 2026

               ORISSA HIGH COURT : CUTTACK

                  WP(C) No.23281 of 2025

An application under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of
                            India.



                              ***

Swarnalata Biswal and others ... Petitioners

-VERSUS-


     Babuli Prusty & others
                                    ...       Opposite Parties



Counsel appeared for the parties:

For the Petitioners      : Mr. S.Das, Advocate


For the Opposite Parties :Mr.S.Nayak, ASC.

P R E S E N T:

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA

Date of Hearing : 08.01.2026 :: Date of Judgment : 08.01.2026

J UDGMENT

ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA, J.--

1. This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the

Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioners

praying for quashing the impugned order dated 16.05.2025

(Annexure-9) passed in R.P. Case No.311/2014 under Section

15(b) of the O.S.S. Act, 1958 by the Addl. Commissioner, Addl.

Revision Court No.I, Bhubaneswar (O.P. No.4).

2. Heard from the learned counsel for the petitioners and

the learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State.

3. The factual backgrounds of this writ petition, which

promoted the petitioners for filing of the same is that, the R.P.

Case No.311/2014, which was filed by the Petitioners was

rejected by the Addl. Commissioner, Addl. Revision Court No.I,

Bhubaneswar (O.P. No.4) on dated 16.05.2025 (Annexure-9)

on the ground of non-submission of the Hal-Sabik index and

trace map in respect of the case land.

4. During the course of hearing of this writ petition, the

learned counsel for the petitioners drew the attention of this

Court to the certified copy of the report dated 05.01.2023 of

the Addl. Tahasildar, Bhubaneswar (which was obtained from

the records of R.P. Case No.311/2014).

5. It appears from the Annexure-8 that, the report dated

05.01.2023 of the Addl. Tahasildar, Bhubaneswar was

submitted before the O.P. No.4 in R.P. Case No.311/2014 as

per letter No.2618 stating about the Sabik-Hal

correspondences of the case land, but, still then, without

looking to the letter No.2618 dated 01.03.2023 vide

Annexure-8 and report dated 05.01.2023 of the Addl.

Tahasildar, Bhubaneswar in respect of the Sabik-Hal

correspondences of the case land, the O.P. No.4 rejected to the

R.P. Case No.311/2014 of the Petitioners blaming to the

Petitioners that, they (Petitioners) have not filed the Sabik-Hal

references of the case land, though, the Sabik-Hal references

of the case land was available in the records of R.P. Case

No.311/2014 and though, it was the duty of the Addl.

Commissioner, Addl. Revision Court No.I, Bhubaneswar (O.P.

No.4) to pass the final order in R.P. Case No.311/2014

referring the Sabik-Hal references available in the record

submitted by the Addl. Tahasildar, Bhubaneswar as per letter

No.2618 dated 01.03.2023, but, the O.P. No.4 has not done

so.

for which, the impugned order dated 16.05.2025

(Annexure-9) passed in R.P. Case No.311/2014 by the Addl.

Commissioner, Addl. Revision Court No.I, Bhubaneswar (O.P.

No.4) cannot be sustainable under law. The same is liable to

be quashed.

6. Therefore, there is merit in the writ petition filed by the

Petitioners. The same is to be allowed.

7. In result, the writ petition filed by the petitioners is

allowed.

8. The impugned order dated 16.05.2025 (Annexure-9)

passed in R.P. Case No.311/2014 by the Addl. Commissioner,

Addl. Revision Court No.I, Bhubaneswar (O.P. No.4) is

quashed/set aside.

The matter vide R.P. Case No.311/2014 is remitted back

to the Addl. Commissioner, Addl. Revision Court No.I,

Bhubaneswar (O.P. No.4) for deciding the same afresh as per

law after giving opportunity of being heard to the Parties

including the Petitioners and perusing the Sabik-Hal

references submitted by the Addl. Tahasildar, Bhubaneswar

as per letter No.2618 dated 01.03.2023 available in the record

as expeditiously as possible within a period of two months

from the date of appearance of the Petitioner before the O.P.

No.4.

9. The petitioners are directed to appear before the Addl.

Commissioner, Addl. Revision Court No.I, Bhubaneswar (O.P.

No.4) in R.P. Case No.311/2014 on dated 16.01.2026 and to

file the certified copy of this Judgment for the purpose of

receiving directions of Addl. Commissioner, Addl. Revision

Court No.I, Bhubaneswar (O.P. No.4) as to further proceeding

of the said R.P. Case No.311/2014.

10. As such, this writ petition filed by the petitioners is

disposed of finally.

(ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA) JUDGE

Digitally Signed High Court of Orissa, Cuttack 08 .01.

Signed by: BINAYAK 2026// Binayak Sahoo SAHOO Reason: Authentication Jr. Stenographer Location: High Court of Orissa, cuttack Date: 09-Jan-2026 11:16:32

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter