Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Abhay Kumar Nayak And Others vs State Of Orissa .... Opposite Party
2026 Latest Caselaw 3275 Ori

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 3275 Ori
Judgement Date : 8 April, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Orissa High Court

Abhay Kumar Nayak And Others vs State Of Orissa .... Opposite Party on 8 April, 2026

Author: R.K. Pattanaik
Bench: R.K. Pattanaik
             IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
                          ABLAPL No. 3133 of 2025
        Abhay Kumar Nayak and Others            ....          Petitioners
                                              Mr. R.N. Panda, Advocate

                                   -Versus-
        State of Orissa                         ....     Opposite Party
                                            Mr. S. K. Brahma, ASC
                                 Mr. A. Bhuyan, Advocate (Informant)
                 CORAM:
                 MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
Order                             ORDER
No.                              08.04.2026
03.     1.     Heard learned counsel for the respective parties.

2. Instant petition under Section 482 BNSS is filed seeking pre-arrest bail of the petitioners in connection with G.R. Case No.63 of 2025 pending in the file of learned J.M.F.C., Baramba arising out of Baramba P.S. Case No.39 of 2025 on the grounds stated.

3. Perused the FIR as at Annexure-1. It is submitted by Mr. Panda, learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are ready to pay back of Rs.2 lac at present even during the pendency of the suit in C.S. No.17 of 2025 instituted at the behest of the informant. It is claimed that an amount of Rs.3 lac was paid while obtaining no objection of the informant before receipt of the compensation amount. The allegation of the informant is that the entire amount has been appropriated by the petitioners, when she is entitled to 50% share therein.

Considering the nature of the dispute, the matter was referred for mediation but it has been unsuccessful since revealed from the report dated 3rd May, 2025 available in the Court's record. A copy of the plaint in the suit filed by the informant pending in the Court of learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Baramba is produced by Mr. Panda, learned counsel for the petitioners. The submission is that 50% share in compensation has been demanded therein with such other relief sought for. Recorded the submission of learned counsel for the informant that till date, no payment has been made to the informant from the side of the petitioners while misappropriating entire of the compensation money. Recorded the response of the State. It is informed to the Court that the case diary has not been received in spite of the order dated 25th March, 2025.

4. Considering the above and dispute between the parties pending before the Civil Court concerning the share in compensation demanded by the informant, this Court recording the submission of Mr. Panda, learned counsel for the petitioners that at present, the petitioners are ready and willing to pay an amount of Rs.2 lac to the informant, this Court is of the view that since the petitioners belong to one family and petitioner No.1 is the brother of the informant, they should be directed to be released on bail subject to condition imposed besides payment of Rs.2 lac to the informant with an undertaking furnished by petitioner No.1 to return the balance in

installments notwithstanding the pendency of the suit in C.S. No.17 of 2025.

5. Accordingly, it is ordered.

6. In the result, the ABLAPL is disposed of with the direction as aforesaid. In the event, the petitioners surrender before the court of learned J.M.F.C., Baramba within fortnight from today, it is directed that they shall be released on bail in connection with G.R. Case No.63 of 2025 corresponding to Baramba P.S. Case No.39 of 2025 on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.30,000/-(rupees thirty thousand) each with one solvent surety for the like amount each with such other conditions imposed as deemed just and proper and in the facts and circumstances of the case besides the following, such as, petitioner No.1 shall submit an undertaking to pay back the balance with a refund of Rs.2 lac at present in the shape of a Demand Draft payable to the informant at the time of release.

7. Issue urgent certified copy of this order as per rules.

(R.K. Pattanaik) Judge Rojina

Designation: Junior Stenographer

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter