Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 8487 Ori
Judgement Date : 19 September, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLLP No.70 of 2006
State ..... Appellant
Represented By Adv. -
Mr. S.K.Parhi, A.S.C.
-versus-
Prakash Nahak ..... Respondent
Represented By Adv. -
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR
MOHAPATRA
ORDER
19.09.2025 Order No.
01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.
2. On perusal of the leave application, it appears that there exists a delay of two days. However, no limitation application has been filed by the State-Appellant for condonation of such delay. Although, the present leave application was filed on 20.06.2006, the same was never listed until now. Today it has been listed for first time after a gap of two decades, as has been indicated hereinabove and no steps have been taken for condonation of delay.
3. Taking into consideration the seriousness and gravity of the allegation as well as on a close scrutiny of the impugned judgment of the acquittal, this Court is of the view that no substantive ground exists for condonation of delay and to permit the state to prefer an appeal, that to, after expiry of two
decades.
4. In view of the aforesaid position, this Court is not inclined to grant leave to prefer an appeal. Accordingly, the Leave application stands dismissed on the ground of limitation as well as on merits.
( Aditya Kumar Mohapatra ) Judge
Rubi
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!