Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Hari Behera And Others vs Collector
2025 Latest Caselaw 7977 Ori

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 7977 Ori
Judgement Date : 8 September, 2025

Orissa High Court

Hari Behera And Others vs Collector on 8 September, 2025

                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
                            W.P.(C) No.13999 of 2025
        (An application under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950)

        Hari Behera and Others                       ....            Petitioners
                                       -versus-
        Collector, Khurda and others                 ....      Opposite Parties
                  Appeared in this case by Hybrid Arrangement
                             (Virtual/Physical Mode):
                  For Petitioners      -       Mr. Ashok Kumar Panigrahi,
                                               Advocate.

                  For Opposite Parties-        Smt. J. Sahoo,
                                               Addl. Standing Counsel.
                                               (for O.P. Nos.1 to 3)

                  CORAM:
                  HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C.BEHERA

Date of Hearing :08.09.2025 :: Date of Judgment :08.09.2025

A.C. Behera, J. This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the

Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioners praying for

quashing (setting aside) the final order dated 28.10.2024 (Annexure-2)

passed by the Addl. Commissioner, Addl. Revisional Court No.II,

Bhubaneswar in R.P. Case No.1452 of 2014.

2. Heard from the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned ASC

for the State (O.P. Nos.1 to 3).

3. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners

drew the attention of this Court to the impugned order dated 28.10.2024

(Annexure-2) passed in R.P. Case No.1452 of 2014 and contended that,

the said order has been passed for rejection of R.P. Case No.1452 of 2014

filed by the petitioners "on the ground of non-filing of the documents

concerning sabik Hal comparison, flow of title and documents relating to

possession.

The learned ASC for the State argued in support of the impugned

order contending that, the impugned order is neither illegal nor

unreasonable.

4. The required documents relating to comparison of sabik and Hal

records and documents relating to possession are available in the

settlement office of the Addl. Commissioner, as their office is the

custodian of such records. For which, the said documents could have

been called for by the Addl. Commissioner for perusal and disposal of

R.P. No.1452 of 2014 instead of blaming to the petitioners for non-

production of the same.

On this aspect, the propositions of law has already been clarified in a case between Gajendra Prasad Das Vrs. State of Orissa and Others reported in 2016 (2) O.J.R. (265) that, if the petitioner has not produced the non- availability certificate, it can be verified by the State Government being the custodian of the Government records, because, the State Authorities are the custodian of the official records.

So, the impugned order of rejection to the R.P. Case No.1452 of

2014 on dated 28.10.2024 (Annexure-2) by the Addl. Commissioner,

Addl. Revisional Court No.II, Bhubaneswar under Member, Board of

Revenue, Odisha, Cuttack only on the ground of non-production of

documents by the petitioners cannot be sustainable under law. The same

is liable to be quashed.

5. So, there is merit in the writ petition filed by the petitioners. The

same must succeed.

6. In result, the writ petition filed by the petitioners is allowed.

The impugned order dated 28.10.2024 (Annexure-2) passed in R.P.

Case No.1452 of 2014 by the Addl. Commissioner, Addl. Revisional

Court No.II, Bhubaneswar under Member, Board of Revenue, Odisha,

Cuttack is quashed (set aside).

The matter, vide R.P. Case No.1452 of 2014 is remitted back

(remanded back) to the Addl. Commissioner, Addl. Revisional Court

No.II, Bhubaneswar under Member, Board of Revenue, Odisha, Cuttack

for deciding the same afresh as per law within two months from the date

of appearance of the petitioners in that R.P. Case No.1452 of 2014 as per

law after giving opportunity of being heard to the parties.

The petitioners are directed to appear before the Addl.

Commissioner, Addl. Revisional Court No.II, Bhubaneswar under

Member, Board of Revenue, Odisha, Cuttack in R.P. Case No.1452 of

2014 on dated 15.09.2025 for the purpose of receiving the directions of

the said Court as to further proceedings of that R.P. Case No.1452 of

2014.

7. As such, this writ petition filed by the petitioners is disposed of

finally.

(A.C. Behera), Judge.

Orissa High Court, Cuttack.

08.09.2025//Utkalika Nayak// Junior Stenographer

Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack, India.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter