Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ghanalata Dehury @ Nayak vs Antaryami Nayak
2025 Latest Caselaw 10656 Ori

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 10656 Ori
Judgement Date : 29 November, 2025

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Orissa High Court

Ghanalata Dehury @ Nayak vs Antaryami Nayak on 29 November, 2025

Author: Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo
Bench: Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo
                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
                                  MATA No.293 of 2025
            Ghanalata Dehury @ Nayak                ....              Appellant

                                                       Represented By Adv. -
                                                    Mr. A.K. Sahoo, Advocate
                                         -versus-

            Antaryami Nayak                         ....            Respondent
                                                      Represented By Adv. -


                            CORAM:
                            JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK
                            JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO

                                           ORDER

29.11.2025 (Hybrid Mode) Order No. I.A. Nos.405 and 406 of 2025 & MATA No.293 of 2025

01.

1. The appellant-wife is before this Court challenging the judgment dated 30.06.2025 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Sambalpur in C.P. No.31 of 2024. By the said judgment, the civil proceeding filed by the respondent-husband in the marriage U/s.13(1)(i-b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 seeking decree of divorce against the wife-appellant was allowed.

2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant.

3. The appeal has been filed after a reported delay of 5 days in filing the appeal.

4. Issue notice in both the I.A.(s) as well as appeal by Speed Post with A.D. Requisites for issuance of notice be filed within five working days.

Accept one set of process fee as well as postal requisites.

5. In the interim, it is directed that the respondent shall not enter into the marriage during pendency of the appeal. No consequential action shall be taken pursuant to the decree under challenge by any of the parties to the appeal.

6. List after S.R. Liberty to mention.

(Manash Ranjan Pathak) Judge

(Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo) Judge

Radha/Jyostna

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter