Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5182 Ori
Judgement Date : 20 March, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
FAO No.100 of 2025
Upasi Meher & Anr. ..... Appellants
Mr. Satyaban Sahoo,
Advocate
-versus-
Union of India & Anr. ..... Respondents
Mr. Gopinath Sethi,
Sr. Panel Counsel
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI
ORDER
Order 20.03.2025
No. I.A. No.148 of 2025
01. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid
arrangement.
2. Heard.
3. This application has been filed for condoning the
delay in preferring the FAO No.100 of 2025.
4. Considering the submissions and on going
through the averments made in this I.A., prayer is
allowed. Delay in preferring the FAO No.100 of 2025 is,
hereby, condoned.
5. I.A. is disposed of.
6. The present appeal at the instance of the claimants/
appellants is directed against the judgment dated
21.11.2024 passed by the learned Railway Claims
Tribunal, Bhubaneswar Bench, Bhubaneswar in Case
No.OA(IIU)/142/2023.
7. Heard.
3. The brief fact of the case is that on the date of
incident i.e. on 07.07.2023, the deceased named Subendhu
Meher, was travelling by Train No.18125 Rourkela-Puri
Express train from Sambalpur to Puri Railway Station.
During the journey, on the way in between Jarpada
(JRPD) & Kerejanga (KPJG) Railway Station due to
sudden jerk, push and pull of passengers inside the
compartment, the deceased accidentally fell down from
the said running train and sustained multiple injuries and
died on 08.07.2023. Based upon the report of the Station
Superintendent (SS), Kerejanga Railway Station, the
Government Railway Police Station, (GRPS) Cuttack has
registered an UD case No.49/2023 dated 08.07.2023 and
took up investigation into the matter. With regard to the
ticket, it is averred by the Applicants that on the date of
incident their deceased son was travelling with a valid
journey ticket bearing No.UYB-90786173 dated 07/07/2023
Ex- Sambalpur to Puri Railway station, which was
recovered from the possession of the deceased during
preparation of inquest.
4. Learned counsel for the Appellants submits that
the learned Tribunal had awarded a sum of Rs.4,00,000/-
each in favour of the Appellants. However, the
Appellants were permitted to withdraw only 10% of the
awarded amount. He further submits that since the
Appellants were suffering from various diseases, they
may be permitted to withdraw their entire share as
awarded in the above noted judgment.
5. In such view of the matter, this Court modifies
only that part of the judgment dated 21.11.2024 passed by
the learned Railway Claims Tribunal, Bhubaneswar
Bench, Bhubaneswar in Case No.OA(IIU)/142/2023 and
directs that the Appellants/claimants will be permitted to
withdraw 50% of their share as awarded in the judgment
dated 21.11.2024.
6. This FAO is, accordingly, disposed of.
(Dr. S.K. Panigrahi) Judge
Gitanjali
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!