Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5174 Ori
Judgement Date : 20 March, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
FAO No.84 of 2025
Gandharba Sahoo & ..... Appellants
Anr. Mr. Satyaban Sahoo,
Advocate
-versus-
Union of India & Anr. ..... Respondents
Ms. Pratima Nayak, CGC
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI
ORDER
Order 20.03.2025
No. I.A. No.124 of 2025
01. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid
arrangement.
2. Heard.
3. This application has been filed for condoning the
delay in preferring the FAO No.84 of 2025.
4. Considering the submissions and on going
through the averments made in this I.A., prayer is
allowed. Delay in preferring the FAO No.84 of 2025 is,
hereby, condoned.
5. I.A. is disposed of.
6. The present appeal at the instance of the claimants/
appellants is directed against the judgment dated
14.11.2024 passed by the learned Railway Claims
Tribunal, Bhubaneswar Bench, Bhubaneswar in Case
No.OA(IIU)/10/2021.
7. Heard.
8. The brief fact of the case is that on the date of
incident i.e. on 07.09.2019, the deceased named
Gangadhar Sahoo, was travelling by Puri-Angul Fast
Passenger train from Bhubaneswar to Angul Railway
Station. During the journey, he accidentally fell down
from the train near Marthapur Railway Station and
sustained injury. Thereafter, he was taken to S.C.B
Medical College & Hospital, Cuttack, where doctor
declared him 'brought-dead' on 08.09.2019. Based upon
the information of the on duty Doctor of S.C.B Medical
College & Hospital, Cuttack, Mangalabag Police Station
has registered an UD case No.1749/2019 and took up
investigation into the matter. With regard to the ticket, it
is averred by the Applicants that the deceased Gangadhar
Sahoo was a bonafide passenger and before boarding into
the train, he had purchased a ticket to travel to Angul, but
the said ticket was lost in the alleged incident.
9. Learned counsel for the Appellants submits that
the learned Tribunal had awarded a sum of Rs.4,00,000/-
each in favour of the Appellants. However, the Appellant
No.2 had in the meantime died and her share has been
redistributed in favour of Appellant No.1. Hence, the
new share of the Appellant No.1 is Rs.8,00,000/-. The
Appellant No.1 was permitted to withdraw only 50% of
the awarded amount. He further submits that since the
Appellant No.1 is suffering from various diseases, he
may be permitted to withdraw his entire share as
awarded in the above noted judgment.
10. In such view of the matter, this Court modifies
only that part of the judgment dated 14.11.2024 passed by
the learned Railway Claims Tribunal, Bhubaneswar
Bench, Bhubaneswar in Case No.OA(IIU)/10/2021 and
directs that the Appellant No.1/claimant will be
permitted to withdraw 50% of his share as awarded in
the judgment dated 14.11.2024.
11. This FAO is, accordingly, disposed of.
(Dr. S.K. Panigrahi) Judge
Gitanjali
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!