Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sibaram Ra vs ) State Of Odisha ..... Opposite Parties
2025 Latest Caselaw 3013 Ori

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3013 Ori
Judgement Date : 28 January, 2025

Orissa High Court

Sibaram Ra vs ) State Of Odisha ..... Opposite Parties on 28 January, 2025

Author: Aditya Kumar Mohapatra
Bench: Aditya Kumar Mohapatra
                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
                            WP(C) No.1011 of 2025
            Sibaram Ra                   .....       Petitioner
                                                                     Represented By Adv. -
                                                                     Laxmikanta Mohanty

                                                 -versus-
            1) State Of Odisha                               .....       Opposite Parties
            2) Principal Chief Conservator Of                        Represented By Adv. -
            Ofrest. Bbsr                                             Mr. U.C.Jena, A.S.C.
            3) Conservator Of Ofrest, Cuttack
            4) Silciculturist, Office Of Silviculture
            Div., Rayagada
            5) Accountant General, Bbsr

                                   CORAM:
                     THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR
                                 MOHAPATRA

                                                        ORDER
Order No.                                               28.01.2025


    01.         1.      This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual
                /Physical Mode).

2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State.

3. The Petitioner has filed the present writ application with the following prayer:

"(i) a direction shall not be issued to grant grade pay of Rs.4600/- as 3rd RACP benefit in favour of the petitioner."

w.e.f. 1.1.2013 taking into consideration the judgment of this Hon'ble Court rendered in between State of Orissa and others Vrs Biharilal Barik and others in W.P.(C) No.2831 of 2016 dated 27.6.2016 as well as the order passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.(C) No. 12025 of 2024 dated 14.05.2024 under

Annexure-7 and consequential order passed by the D.F.O. Kalahandi North Division vide order dated 23.07.2024 under Annexure -8 in favour of Dibakar Biswal retired Forester

(ii) And after hearing the parties be pleased to direct the opp. parties to extend the grade pay of Rs.4600/- as 3rd RACP benefit in favour of the petitioner with effect from 1.1.2013 taking into consideration the judgment of this Hon'ble Court rendered in between State of Orissa and others Vrs Biharilal Barik and others in W.P.(C) No.2831 of 2016 dated 27.6.2016 and order dated 14.05.2024 passed in W.P.(C) No. 12025 of 2024 under Annexure -7 and accordingly revise his pay under ORSP Rule 2017 w.e.f. 1.1.2016 and release all arrears till his superannuation dated 01.06.2020.

iii) The pension and pensionary benefits of the petitioner be also revised accordingly after re-fixation of his pay under ORSP Rule 2017 and all arrears of pension and pensionary benefit w.e.f. 01.06.2020 within a date to be fixed by this Hon'ble Court.

And pass any other order/orders, direction/directions as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper."

4. In course of hearing of the writ application, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner ventilating his grievance has submitted representation before the Silviculturist, Office of the Silviculture Division Rayagada, Opposite Party No.4 under Annexure-9. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the said representation is pending as of now and a direction be issued to the Opposite Party No.4 to consider the representation of the Petitioner under Annexure-9 within a stipulated period of time.

5. Learned Additional Government Advocate submits that he has no objection if the representation of the Petitioner is considered by the Opposite Party No.4 which is stated to be pending, in accordance with law within a stipulated period of time.

6. Considering the limited nature of grievance of the Petitioner, the writ application is disposed of at the stage of admission with a direction to the Opposite Party No.4 to consider the representation of the Petitioner under Annexure-9 taking into consideration the decision in the case of State of Odisha v. Biharilal Barik in W.P.(C) No.2831 of 2016 disposed of on 27.06.2016, within a period of eight weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. The Opposite Party No.4 shall do well to dispose of the representation of the Petitioner under Annexure-9 by passing a speaking and reasoned order. The decision so taken on the representation of the Petitioner be communicated to the Petitioner within two weeks from the date of taking such decision. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the Case.

7. With the aforesaid observation, the writ application stands disposed of.

Issue urgent certified copy of this order as per Rules.



                                                                          ( A.K. Mohapatra)

                                                                                  Judge
                 Rubi







Reason: Authentication                                                                       Page 3 of 3.
Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack
Date: 29-Jan-2025 15:27:19
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter