Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ramachandra Mundachhina vs State Of Odisha & Others ...... Opp. ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 2837 Ori

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2837 Ori
Judgement Date : 22 January, 2025

Orissa High Court

Ramachandra Mundachhina vs State Of Odisha & Others ...... Opp. ... on 22 January, 2025

Author: Sashikanta Mishra
Bench: Sashikanta Mishra
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
                     W.P (C) No. 17012 of 2024

    An application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of
    India)
                                 ---------------

      Ramachandra Mundachhina               .....    Petitioner

                           -Versus-

      State of Odisha & Others           ......      Opp. Parties
      Advocate(s) appeared in this case:-
      _______________________________________________________
        For Petitioner     : Mr. Satyajit Behera, Advocate

         For Opp. Parties : Mr. S. Behera
                          Additional Government Advocate

         ___________________________________________
      CORAM:
           JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
                            JUDGMENT

nd 22 January, 2025 SASHIKANTA MISHRA, J.

An advertisement was issued for filing up the

post of Jogan Sahayak (Supply Assistant) of five Gram

Panchayats including Malijubang Gram Panchayat in the

district of Kalahandi. The petitioner was earlier working as

Jogan Sahayak (Supply Assistant) under the said Gram

Panchayat on adhoc basis. He applied for the post

pursuant to the said advertisement but no selection

process was held for which he approached this Court in

W.P.(C) No.14142 of 2022. The said writ application was

disposed of by order dated 24.06.2022 directing the

Collector to consider the representation of the petitioner.

Pursuant to such order, the Collector, Kalahandi by order

dated 17.03.2023, disposed of the representation without

granting any relief to the petitioner by directing the

B.D.O., Lanjigarh to expedite the process of selection

within a month. It is stated that no action was taken

despite such order of the Collector for which the petitioner

again approached this Court in W.P.(C) No.16134 of 2023.

By order dated 18.05.2023, this Court disposed of the writ

application granting liberty to the petitioner to move to the

Collector regarding non-implementation of his earlier

order and in such event, the Collector was to immediately

take up the matter regarding compliance of his earlier

order.

2. Pursuant to such order, the petitioner submitted

representation on 26.05.2023 to the Collector. While the

representation was pending, fresh advertisement was

issued on 07.07.2023 by the B.D.O., Lanjigarh for the post

of Jogan Sahayak (Supply Assistant). Instead of

challenging the said action of the B.D.O., the petitioner

applied pursuant to the advertisement and participated in

the selection process. In the final merit list the petitioner's

name did not find place. Being thus aggrieved, he has filed

the present writ application with the following prayer:-

"Under the circumstances it is humbly prayed therefore that the Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ/writs by quashing the select list which was recommended by the BDO Lanjigarh dated 02.07.2024 to Sub-Collector Bhawanipatna i.e. Opp. Party No.4, under Annexure-12;

And further be pleased to direct the opp. Party No.3 to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment as Jogan Sahayak in Malijubang Gram Panchayat in pursuance of advertisement dated 14.07.2014 under Annexure-1 or in the alternative to consider his case as per 2nd advertisement with regard to preference category;

` And further be pleased to direct the opp.

Parties to give all consequential service benefits:

Or pass any other order(s) direction(s) as this Hon'ble Court may think fit and proper,

And allow this Writ Application."

3. Mr. Satyajit Behera, learned counsel for the

petitioner submits that the authorities had acted in a

manner contrary to the directions of this Court inasmuch

as the Collector's order directing the B.D.O. to conclude

the selection process pursuant to the advertisement dated

14.07.2014 was not given effect to. On the contrary, a

fresh advertisement was issued. Moreover, in the fresh

selection process, the experience of the petitioner was

never taken into consideration.

4. Mr. Sarbeswar Behera, learned Additional

Government Advocate, on the other hand would argue that

once the petitioner chose to apply pursuant to the fresh

advertisement, he is estopped from contending that the

selection process pursuant to the earlier advertisement

issued in 2014 should be completed. Moreover, he

participated in the fresh selection and was unsuccessful.

Therefore, he cannot challenge the selection of the final

merit list published. Mr. Behera, further submits that

even otherwise, the petitioner's performance as a Jogan

Sahayak (Supply Assistant) on adhoc basis was beset with

several irregularities and misconducts. Therefore, his

experience as such could not have been considered.

5. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and

taking note of the rival contentions narrated above, this

Court is primarily of the view that the petitioner having

willfully participated in the selection process held

pursuant to the fresh advertisement i.e., issued on

07.07.2023, is estopped from contending that the

selection process pursuant to the earlier advertisement

ought to have been completed. Moreover, having

participated in the selection process and having failed to

be selected on merit, he is also estopped to challenge the

selection process.

6. This Court is, therefore, not inclined to grant the

relief claimed by the petitioner. It is, however, stated at the

bar that there are some vacancies available against which

the petitioner's candidature can be considered taking into

account his experience. In this regard the petitioner has

also approached the Collector, Kalahandi by submitting a

representation on 28.08.2024. Said representation is

pending. Such being the case, the writ application is

disposed of by directing the Collector, Kalahandi to

consider the representation submitted by the petitioner

and to take a decision thereon in accordance with law

within two months from the date of production of certified

copy of this order.

7. While disposing the representation the Collector shall

also consider the previous experience of the petitioner for

which, it shall be open to him to submit appropriate

material.

...............................

Sashikanta Mishra, Judge

Orissa High Court, Cuttack The 22nd of January, 2025/ P. Ghadai

Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter