Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ranjulata Pradhan & Ors vs State Of Odisha & Anr. ..... Opp. Parties
2025 Latest Caselaw 11371 Ori

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 11371 Ori
Judgement Date : 16 December, 2025

[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Orissa High Court

Ranjulata Pradhan & Ors vs State Of Odisha & Anr. ..... Opp. Parties on 16 December, 2025

Author: Aditya Kumar Mohapatra
Bench: Aditya Kumar Mohapatra
                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
                              CRLMC No.5320 of 2025
            Ranjulata Pradhan & Ors.      .....     Petitioners
                                                          Represented by Adv. -
                                                          Susanta Kumar Baral

                                           -versus-
            State Of Odisha & Anr.                .....            Opp. Parties
                                                          Represented by Adv. -
                                                          U.C. Jena, A.S.C.

                                 CORAM:
                   THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR
                               MOHAPATRA

                                           ORDER

16.12.2025 Order No.

01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).

2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners as well as learned counsel for the State. Perused the application as well as the documents annexed thereto.

3. By filing the application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S, the Petitioners seek to invoke the inherent jurisdiction of this Court to quash the F.I.R in Baliapal P.S Case No.340 of 2025 corresponding to C.T Case No.1077 of 2025 pending in the court of learned J.M.F.C, Basta, Balasore for commission of offence under Sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 117(2), 3(5), 351(3) of B.N.S.

5. Learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioners at the outset contended that since the investigation is at the nascent stage, he

does not want to press this application with liberty to approach this Court at an appropriate stage.

6. In such view of the matter, the application is being disposed of by granting liberty as prayed for.

7. Further considering the gravity and seriousness of the allegation and the offences indicated in the F.I.R and keeping in view the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar reported in AIR 2014 SC 2756 & in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & anr. reported in 2022 LiveLaw (SC) 577, this Court directs the Petitioners to cooperate with the investigation by appearing before the I.O. In such eventuality, the I.O shall explore the possibility of applying the provisions of Section 35 of B.N.S.S in terms of the abovenoted judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court. In the event, the case of the Petitioners falls within the parameter of the Section 35 of B.N.S.S, the Petitioners be noticed under the aforesaid section as directed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

8. With the aforesaid observations/ directions, the CRLMC is disposed of.

Issue urgent certified copy of this order as per Rules.

( Aditya Kumar Mohapatra) Judge Anil

Designation: Junior Stenographer

Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 17-Dec-2025 19:02:39

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter