Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bisal Uthansingh @ vs State Of Odisha
2025 Latest Caselaw 6664 Ori

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6664 Ori
Judgement Date : 4 April, 2025

Orissa High Court

Bisal Uthansingh @ vs State Of Odisha on 4 April, 2025

Author: G. Satapathy
Bench: G. Satapathy
     IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
                   CRLREV NO.173 of 2025

   (An application U/S. 438 & 442 of BNSS, 2023 r/w Sec.
   102 of the Juvenile Justice Care and Protection of
   Childrens' Act, 2015).

   Bisal Uthansingh @           ....                  Petitioner
   Bishal
                              -versus-
   State of Odisha              ....                 Respondent

   For Petitioner      :             Mr. A.K.Dash, Advocate


   For Opposite        :                 Mr. S.K.Rout, Addl.PP
   Party

       CORAM:
                    JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY

  F DATE OF HEARING & JUDGMENT:04.04.2025 (ORAL)

G. Satapathy, J.

1. This criminal revision U/S. 102 of the

Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act,

2015 (in short "the Act") is directed against the

judgment dated 19.02.2025 passed by the learned 2nd

Addl. Sessions Judge-cum-PO-Children Court,

Berhampur in Criminal Appeal No.03 of 2025

confirming the order dated 03.02.2025 passed by the

learned JJB, Chatrapur in JGR Case No. 07 of 2025

arising out of Pattapur PS Case No. 39 of 2025

refusing to grant bail to the revision-petitioner who is

a child in conflict with law-cum-CICL for commission of

offence U/S. 20(b)(ii)(C) of NDPS Act, on the

allegation of transporting 21Kgs. of Contraband Ganja

on a motor cycle bearing Regd. No. OD20C-0383.

2. Heard, Mr.Azad Keshori Dash, learned

counsel for the revision-petitioner and Mr.S.K.Rout,

learned Addl. PP and perused the record.

3. Indisputably, bail to CICL can be refused

only on the grounds enumerated in the proviso to

Sec. 12 of the Act which prescribes that unless the

release of the child is likely to bring into association

with any known criminal or expose him to moral,

physical or psychological danger or his release would

defeat the ends of justice, the CICL be released on

bail with or without surety, but in this case, the

learned Appellate Court has not applied the materials

collected by the Investigating Agency in terms of the

proviso to Sec. 12 of the Act to refuse bail to the

CICL and thereby, the impugned order of the

Appellate Court is unsustainable in the eye of law. It

is no doubt true that the offence under NDPS Act

involving commercial quantity is a serious offence

and is against the society, but fact remains that if a

statutes caste a duty on the Court to apply a

particular provision in a particular way, then the

same has to be done in that way irrespective of the

fact that the offence is serious or heinous. In refusing

bail to the revision-petitioner, the learned Appellate

Court has observed that the action of any accused for

a similar offence under NDPS Act cannot be viewed in

isolation. On the other hand, the revision-petitioner

has been detained in Observation Home since

16.01.2025 and no criminal antecedent has been

reported against him, but the investigation has

progressed a lot.

4. On a careful scrutiny of materials placed

on record, this Court does not find any reasonable

materials to believe that the release of the revision-

petitioner would bring him into association with any

known criminal or expose him to moral, physical or

psychological danger or his release would defeat the

ends of justice. In view of the above facts and after

having considered the rival submissions and keeping

in view the other circumstances on record in entirety

and considering the case of the revision-petitioner on

the face of the proviso appended to Sec. 12 of the

Act, this Court considers it proper to admit the CICI-

cum-petitioner to bail.

5. In the result, the criminal revision

stands allowed on contest, but in the circumstance,

there is no order as to cost. Ergo, the impugned

order passed by the learned Appellate Court as well

as the order passed by the learned JJB, Chatrapur in

refusing bail to the CICL are hereby set aside and

consequently, the CICL is directed to be released on

bail by the forum in seisin over the matter on such

terms and conditions as deems fit and proper.

(G. Satapathy)

Digitally Signed Judge Signed by: KISHORE KUMAR SAHOO Designation: Secretary Reason: Authentication Orissa High Court, Cuttack, Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 05-Apr-2025 17:59:05 Dated the 4th April, 2025/Kishore

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter