Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jitendra Patel vs State Of Odisha .... Opposite Party
2024 Latest Caselaw 16243 Ori

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 16243 Ori
Judgement Date : 5 November, 2024

Orissa High Court

Jitendra Patel vs State Of Odisha .... Opposite Party on 5 November, 2024

Author: V. Narasingh

Bench: V. Narasingh

                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
                           BLAPL No. 10724 of 2024

             Jitendra Patel                  ....          Petitioner
                                       Mr. Sk. Zafarulla, Advocate

                                    -versus-

             State of Odisha                 ....     Opposite Party
                                              Mr. S. Panigrahi, ASC

                         CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
                                  ORDER

05.11.2024 Order No.

01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. The Petitioner is an accused in connection with T.R. Case No.118/10 of 2023-24 pending on the file of learned Additional Sessions Judge (LR & LTV), Sambalpur, arising out of Dhanupalli P.S. Case No.227 of 2023 for commission of offence alleged under Sections 20(b)(ii)(c)/29 of the NDPS Act.

3. Learned counsel, on instruction, submits that except the present BLAPL, no other bail application of the Petitioner relating to the aforementioned P.S. case is pending in any other Court.

4. Being aggrieved by the rejection of his application for bail U/s.483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) by the learned Additional

Sessions Judge (LR & LTV), Sambalpur (I/c) by order dated 20.08.2024 in the aforementioned case, the present BLAPL has been filed.

5. It is stated that the Petitioner is in custody since 20.07.2023 on the allegation that he along with co-accused were involved in transportation of contraband (ganja) to the tune of 105kgs.

6. On instruction, it is submitted by the learned counsel that the Petitioner is the first offender.

7. It is submitted by the learned counsel that co- accused, namely, Dillip Swain & Sribas Pradhan have since been released on bail by this Court by orders dated 17.09.2024 and 30.09.2024 in BLAPL Nos.1921 & 9487 of 2024 respectively. Hence, Petitioner seeks release inter alia on the ground of parity and in this context learned counsel relies on the judgment of the Apex Court in the case Satender Kumar Antil vrs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51 more particularly paragraph 98 thereof.

8. It is submitted by the learned counsel that in the meanwhile another co-accused Samir Ranjan Bohidar has been released on bail by this Court by order dated 28.06.2024 in BLAPL No.6114 of 2024.

9. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that so far as the co-

accused Samir Ranjan Bohidar is concerned he is ex- facie not similarly placed with the present Petitioner.

10. Learned counsel for the State further submits that in view of the bar contained in 37(1)(b)(ii) of the NDPS Act as well as the order of the Apex Court in the case of State by the Inspector of Police vs. B. Ramu in SLP(Crl.) No(s).8137 of 2022 dated 12.02.2024, the Petitioner is not entitled to be released on bail.

11. While releasing the co-accused this Court took note of the fact that the independent witnesses, namely, P.Ws.1 to 3 have not supported the prosecution and while considering the bail application of the Petitioners therein, reliance was placed on the judgment of the Apex court in the case of Ankur Chaudhary vs. State of Madhya Pradesh in SLP (Crl.) No.4648 of 2024 dated 28.05.2024.

12. Learned counsel for the Petitioner further submits that the Petitioner has his home and hearth within the jurisdiction of the learned Court in seisin hence there is no chance of his fleeing the course of justice.

13. Taking into account the release of the co- accused the evidence on record as noted, this Court directs the Petitioner to be released on bail on such

terms to be fixed by the learned Court in seisin subject to verification of criminal antecedent.

14. If it comes to the fore that the Petitioner has any criminal antecedent, this order shall not be given effect to.

15. Additionally, it is directed that Petitioner shall appear before the jurisdictional police station once every month on such date and time to be fixed by the learned Court in seisin till conclusion of trial. Certification of such appearance shall be submitted to the Court in seisin.

16. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of.

17. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rules.

(V. NARASINGH) Judge

Ayesha

Designation: Junior Stenographer

Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 06-Nov-2024 18:56:19

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter