Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bharat Chandra Prusty vs State Of Odisha
2024 Latest Caselaw 332 Ori

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 332 Ori
Judgement Date : 8 January, 2024

Orissa High Court

Bharat Chandra Prusty vs State Of Odisha on 8 January, 2024

Author: S.K. Sahoo

Bench: S.K. Sahoo

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

                            CRLA No.1396 of 2023

              Bharat Chandra Prusty               ....   Appellant/
                                                       Petitioner

                                    Mr. R.K.Pattanaik, Advocate

                                       -versus-

              State of Odisha                     ....   Respondent/
              (Vigilance)                              Opp.Party

                                 Mr. Sanjay Kumar Das
                                 Standing Counsel (Vig.)
                                   CORAM:
                              JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO
                                  ORDER
Order No.                      08.01.2024
                            CRLA No.1396 of 2023

01. This matter is taken up through Hybrid arrangement (video conferencing/physical Mode).

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Das, learned Standing Counsel for the Vigilance Department submitted that he has received the copy of the appeal memo along with the copies of the impugned judgment and interim application. He undertakes to file his appearance memo by the end of this month.

Heard.

Admit.

Call for the trial Court record.

Mr. Das, learned Standing Counsel for the Vigilance Department submits that two connected Appeals i.e., CRLA Nos.1378 of 2023 and 1389 of 2023 have been filed and in both the Criminal Appeals, the learned trial Court records have been called for.

Before calling for the trial Court records the Registry // 2 //

shall verify regarding availability of the trial Court records in the aforesaid two Criminal Appeals. Henceforth, the present Criminal Appeal shall be listed along with CRLA Nos.1378 of 2023 and 1389 of 2023.

[

( S.K. Sahoo) Judge

02. This is an application for bail.

Heard learned counsel for the appellant-petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the Vigilance Department.

The appellant-petitioner Bharat Chandra Prusty has been convicted under section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, section 7 and section 13(2) read with section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 and sentenced to undergo R.I. for a period of six months for the offence under section 7 of the Prevention of corruption Act, to undergo R.I. for two years and to pay a fine of Rs.20,000/- (rupees twenty thousand), in default, to undergo R.I. for a further period of six months for the offence section under section 13(2) read with section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 and to undergo R.I. for six months for the offence under section 120B of the Indian Penal Code and all the sentences are directed to run concurrently by the learned Special Judge (Vigilance), Dhenkanal in V.G.R. No.04 of 2007/DKL T.R. No. 21 of 2017.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was on bail during trial and after the impugned order of conviction and sentence was passed, he is also on bail and has never misutilized the liberty granted to him and

// 3 //

therefore, the petitioner may be directed to be released on bail pending disposal of the appeal.

Learned counsel for the Vigilance Department opposed the prayer for bail.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the respective parties, the nature of evidence adduced by the prosecution during trial, the sentence imposed by the learned trial Court, the fact that he was on bail during trial and absence of any allegation of misutilization of the liberty and absence of chance of early hearing of the appeal in the near future, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail.

Let the appellant-petitioner be released on surrendering before the learned trial Court on bail pending disposal of the appeal on furnishing bail bond of Rs.50,000/- (rupees fifty thousand) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.

The I.A. is disposed of.

( S.K. Sahoo) Judge

03. This is an application for stay of realization of fine.

Heard.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, let there be stay of realization of fine amount imposed on the appellant-petitioner pursuant to the judgment and order dated 16.12.2023 passed by the learned Special Judge (Vigilance), Dhenkanal in V.G.R. No.04 of 2007/DKL T.R. No. 21 of 2017 pending disposal of the

// 4 //

criminal appeal.

The I.A. is disposed of.

Issue urgent certified copy as per Rules. Free copy of the order be supplied to the learned counsel for the Vigilance Department.

( S.K. Sahoo) Judge M.K.Rout

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter