Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 11249 Ori
Judgement Date : 14 September, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C). No. 11814 of 2023
(An application under Article 226 & 227 of the Constitution of
India)
---------------
Santosh Kumar Samal ...... Petitioner
-Versus-
State of Odisha and others .... Opposite Parties
Advocate(s) appeared in this case:-
_______________________________________________________
For Petitioner : Mr. S. P.Jena, Advocate.
For Opp. Parties : Mr. S.N.Dash
Additional Standing Counsel
Mr. B.P. Tripathy
Appearing for NHM
_______________________________________________________
CORAM:
JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
JUDGMENT
14th September, 2023 SASHIKANTA MISHRA, J.
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Heard Mr. S. P. Jena, learned counsel for the petitioner,
Mr. S.N.Das, learned Additional Standing Counsel for the
State and Mr. B.P.Tripathy, learned counsel appearing for the
National Health Mission(NHM).
3. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was
appointed as an Ayush Doctor on contractual basis under
the RBSK scheme and was posted at Parjang CHC as per
order dated 25.10.2014 passed by the CDMO, Dhenkanal.
Before entering into such employment, he was required to
execute a contractual service agreement with the Odisha
Health and Family Welfare Society, which he complied.
Accordingly, he joined and performed his duties from
25.10.2014. By order dated 05.04.2023 the CDMO
Dhenkanal, on being informed that the petitioner had
remained in judicial custody from 15.03.2023 to 18.03.2023,
terminated his contractual service basing on Clause 9 of the
contractual service agreement. It is submitted that the
petitioner was implicated in a criminal case being 2 (a) CC
No. 25 of 2023 of the Court of learned J.M.F.C., Bhuban
under Section 52(a) (i) of the Odisha Excise Act, 2008. By
judgment passed on 18.05.2023, learned J.M.F.C. held that
the prosecution had failed to prove its case beyond all
reasonable doubts against the petitioner-accused and
therefore holding him not guilty of the alleged offence,
acquitted him.
4. Mr. Jena, learned counsel for the petitioner submits
that having been acquitted in the criminal case, there is no
impediment for reengagement of the petitioner and therefore,
the concerned authorities should be directed accordingly.
5. Mr. S.N.Das, learned State counsel submits that the
petitioner's services were terminated basing on the
contractual service agreement and therefore, no fault can be
attributed to the authority in this regard.
6. Mr. B.P.Tripathy has drawn attention of this Court to
Clause-9 of the contractual service agreement to submit that
once the contractual employee is detained in custody on a
criminal charge or otherwise for a period exceeding 48 hours,
the society has the power to terminate his service.
7. Having considered the rival submissions, this Court is
of the view that the termination of services of the petitioner
cannot be treated as illegal in any manner, in view of the
relevant clause in the agreement. For immediate reference
Clause-9 is reproduced hereinbelow:
"In case of improper conduct by the Second Party, the OSH & FWS may terminate this Agreement and no compensation shall be payable in such case. This contract is issued on the understanding that all the information given by the Second Party in his application form and during the interview are correct, true and complete. If it is found at any point of time that the information given when seeking appointment is not complete and true and/or any significant information has been knowingly suppressed, the society will have the right either to withdraw the letter of contractual engagement before he/she has taken up service with the society without any notice or compensation.
Notwithstanding anything contained hereinabove, the service of the second party may be terminated at any point of time by the competent authority of the society if the second party is found to be involved in criminal offence or guilty of any insubordination, intemperance or other misconduct or any breach of trust as specified in Clause No.11 of the terms& conditions or non-performance or at the completion of the project as intimated.
Further, the contractual services of the Second Party from the OSH & FW society shall be terminated at any point of time if the Second Party is detained in custody whether on a criminal charge or otherwise for a period exceeding forty-eight(48) hours, with effect from the date of such detention by an order of the concerned appointing authority."
Since it is not disputed that the petitioner was in custody for
more than 48 hours being implicated in a criminal case, the
order terminating his services has to be treated as being in
consonance of the agreement. Nevertheless, fact remains that
the criminal case in question has ended in clean acquittal of
the petitioner. As such, there appears to be no longer any bar
in reengaging the petitioner in his former appointment.
8. The writ application is therefore, disposed of directing
the CDMO, Dhenkanal (Opposite Party-4) to take note of the
developments in the case particularly, the fact of acquittal of
the petitioner from the criminal case and to consider
reengaging him in his former position, if there is no other
legal impediment. A decision in this regard shall be taken
within a period of four weeks from the date of the production
of certified copy of this order by the petitioner.
9. The writ application is disposed of accordingly.
...............................
Sashikanta Mishra, Judge
Orissa High Court, Cuttack, The 14th September, 2023/ Deepak Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: DEEPAK PARIDA Reason: Authentication Location: OHC, Cuttack Date: 18-Sep-2023 11:58:30
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!