Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 12117 Ori
Judgement Date : 6 October, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
MATA No.144 of 2022
Sureiya Khatun Ruhi ......... Appellant
Mrs. Ruchi Rajgarhia, Advocate
-Versus-
Md. Tousif Alam ......... Respondent
Mr. Manas Kumar Chand, Advocate
CORAM:
JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA
JUSTICE SIBO SANKAR MISHRA
ORDER
06.10.2023 Order No.
10. 1. Mrs. Rajgarhia, learned advocate appears on behalf of appellant.
She submits, the appeal has been preferred against impugned judgment
dated 10th May, 2022 denying her client custody. Two grounds were held
against her. Firstly, she did not have the means to support the girl child and
secondly, the girl child might have attained puberty. The financial
degradation has been compounded by respondent-husband's non-
compliance of order for payment of maintenance. The girl is only nine
years old and studying in class-IV. She seeks interim intervention, pending
hearing of the appeal.
2. Mr. Chand, learned advocate appears on behalf of the respondent-
husband. He submits, the mother has no real claim for custody and that has
been seen through by the Court below on delayed approach by her. He
opposes the appeal.
3. Submission at the Bar is that the child is present in Court pursuant
to direction in order dated 21st September, 2023 made by coordinate
Bench. So also are present appellant and respondent-husband. We have
seen the child in Court. That is sufficient. Presence of the child and the
parties in future is excused.
4. Parties are to come ready for hearing and disposal of the appeal
on adjourned date.
5. List on 17th October, 2023.
(Arindam Sinha) Judge
(S.S. Mishra) Judge
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBHASIS MOHANTY Designation: P.A.
Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack. Date: 06-Oct-2023 15:12:40
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!