Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2401 Ori
Judgement Date : 23 March, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.A. No. 70 of 2020
Asst. Provident Fund Commissioner .... Appellant
(Accounts), Employees Provident Fund
Organization, Bhubaneswar
Mr. Santosh Kumar Pattanaik, Senior Advocate
-versus-
Benga Devi .... Respondent
None
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE
JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
ORDER
Order No. 23.03.2023
02. 1. The writ appeal is being listed three years after the judgment of the learned Single Judge and the Respondent is a widow. Undoubtedly, recovery of the outstanding loan at this stage from the widow, apart from the litigation expenses she would have to incur, would cause her enormous hardship.
2. In the circumstances, the question of law arising from the impugned judgment is left open for consideration in some other appropriate case. It is clarified that the said order will not constitute a precedent. The writ appeal is disposed of in the above terms.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice
(G. Satapathy) Judge S.K. Jena/Secy.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!