Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 16002 Ori
Judgement Date : 13 December, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.A. No. 2847 of 2023
State of Odisha and another .... Appellants
Mr. S. Nayak, Additional Standing Counsel
-versus-
Goura Mohan Prusty and others .... Respondents
Mr. P.K. Mohapatra, Advocate for Resp. No.1
CORAM:
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DR. B.R. SARANGI
MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
ORDER
Order No. 13.12.2023 I.A. No.8311 of 2023 and W.A. No.2847 of 2023
01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.
2. The above Interlocutory Application has been filed for condonation of delay of 520 days in filing the writ appeal.
3. Heard Mr. S. Nayak, learned Additional Standing Counsel appearing for the State-Appellants and Mr. P.K. Mohapatra, learned counsel for the Respondent No.1.
4. As it appears, the order impugned has been passed on 19.05.2022 and the writ appeal has been filed on 20.11.2023 and in the meantime more than seventeen months have passed. Therefore, the appeal suffers from delay and laches. Further, it appears that sufficient cause has not been shown to condone the delay of 520 days in preferring the writ appeal. That apart, no due diligence has been indicated in the petition in preferring the writ appeal.
5. It is further contended that similar matter has also come up before this Court in OJC No.2147 of 1991, which was decided on 24.03.1992 and this Court has considered the case of Job Contract employees for regularization of service and for pension and pensionary benefits. In O.A. No.3020(C) of 2003 (Nityananda
Biswal v. State of Orissa and Others), the Tribunal vide order dated 04.01.2004 also directed that the period of the engagement of the petitioner in job contract establishment should be taken into account as qualifying service and accordingly his pension and other pensionary benefits be revised and paid to the petitioner therein, the order passed in O.A. No.3020(C) of 2003 was also challenged by the State before this Court in W.P.(C) No.14244 of 2006. This Court vide order dated 09.04.2014 dismissed the writ application preferred by the State against the order passed by the Tribunal. The State also preferred Special Leave to Appeal (C) CC No.12573 of 2015 against the order passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.14244 of 2006, which was dismissed by the apex Court vide order dated 13.07.2015.
6. In the above view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to entertain the writ appeal at this belated stage, as the same suffers from delay and laches, in view of the judgment/order of this Court in the case of State of Odisha v. Surama Manjari Das (W.P.(C) No. 15763 of 2021 dismissed on 16.07.2021), which has been confirmed by the apex Court, vide order dated 05.04.2023 in S.L.P.(C) Diary No. 9259 of 2023.
7. Accordingly, the interlocutory application merits no consideration and the same is hereby dismissed. Consequentially, the writ appeal is also dismissed.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
(M.S. RAMAN) JUDGE S. Behera/ M. Panda
Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 14-Dec-2023 11:50:48
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!