Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 15943 Ori
Judgement Date : 12 December, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLA No.625 of 2022
Dambarudhar Nayak .... Appellant/
Petitioner
Mr. Jateswar Nayak, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha .... Respondent/
Opp. Party
Mr. Sonak Mishra
Addl. Standing Counsel
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO
ORDER
Order No. 12.12.2023 07. This matter is taken up through Hybrid
arrangement (video conferencing/physical Mode).
Learned counsel for the State has produced the custody certificate issued by the Superintendent, Model Convict Prison, Athgarh, which is taken on record.
( S.K. Sahoo) Judge
08. This is an application under section 389 of Cr.P.C.
for grant of bail.
Heard.
Perused the impugned judgment. The appellant-petitioner has been convicted for the offence punishable under section 376(2)(i) read with // 2 //
section 6 of the POCSO Act and sentenced to undergo R.I. for a period of ten years and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand), in default, to undergo R.I. for a further period of six months for the offence under section 376(2)(i) of the I.P.C. and in view of section 42 of the POCSO Act, no separate sentence has been awarded for the offence under section 6 of the POCSO Act by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge -cum- Special Judge, Jagatsinghpur vide judgment and order dated 7th January 2019 passed in Special G.R. Case No.03 of 2013.
Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is in judicial custody for more than six years, out of ten years of substantive sentence imposed by the learned trial Court and there is no chance of early hearing of the appeal in the near future and paper book has not been prepared and on hearing learned counsel for the State, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail.
Let the appellant-petitioner be released on bail pending disposal of the appeal on furnishing bail bond of Rs.50,000/-(rupees fifty thousand) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with such terms and conditions as the learned Court may deem just and proper.
The I.A. is accordingly disposed of.
(P.T.O.)
// 3 //
Issue urgent certified copy as per Rules.
( S.K. Sahoo) Judge
09. This is an application for stay of realization of fine.
Heard.
There shall be stay of realization of fine amount imposed on the appellant-petitioner by the Addl. Sessions -cum- Special Judge, Jagatsinghpur vide judgment and order dated 7th January 2019 passed in Special G.R. Case No.03 of 2013 pending disposal of the criminal appeal.
The I.A. is disposed of.
Issue urgent certified copy as per Rules.
( S.K. Sahoo) Judge sipun
Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK Date: 13-Dec-2023 17:55:28
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!