Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1398 Ori
Judgement Date : 16 February, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ARBA No.4 Of 2016
(Through hybrid mode)
State of Orissa and others .... Appellants
Mr. P.P. Mohanty, AGA
-versus-
M/s. Engineers & Builders Ltd., .... Respondent
BBSR Mr. S. Dwibedi, Advocate
CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA Order ORDER No. 16.02.2022
13. 1. Mr. Mohanty, learned advocate, Additional Government Advocate appears on behalf of appellants. He submits, judgment dated 10th September, 2015 made by Court of District Judge, Sambalpur requires interference in appeal.
2. On query from Court he submits, his first ground of challenge against the award (since appeal is continuation of the challenge) is regarding claim no.1. There was rate fixed for extra works not provided by the contract. The rates were fixed by 6th Supervisory Committee and 4th High Level Technical Committee. The Committees cannot be said to have been contracting parties to have modified it.
3. Regarding claim no.2 Mr. Mohanty submits, there could not have been interest granted for retention of security money. No such provision was there in the contract. Claim no.6 according to him is also not covered by four corners of contract. As such, this claim too
// 2 //
could not have been awarded in favour of respondent.
4. Mr. Dwibwdi, learned advocate appears on behalf of respondent. He will be heard on adjourned date.
5. List on 23rd February, 2022.
(Arindam Sinha) Judge Sks
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!