Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 9165 Ori
Judgement Date : 1 September, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
MATA No. 121 of 2020
Sri Sarat Chandra Pradhan .... Appellant
Mr. B.K. Nayak, Advocate
-versus-
Smt. Nalini Prava Das .... Respondent
None CORAM:
JUSTICE S.K. MISHRA JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
Order No. ORDER 01.09.2021
03. The matter is taken up by hybrid mode.
Heard Mr. B.K. Nayak, learned counsel for the appellant. The Judgment and decree dated 21.03.2020 in MAT-18/2015 has been passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Kodala, so the appeal to the High Court does not lie under the Family Court's Act.
Accordingly, the appellant is allowed to withdraw the appeal with a liberty to file the same before the appropriate appellate court having jurisdiction.
The certified copy of the impugned judgment as well as the appeal memo with appropriate endorsement be returned to the appellant.
The appellant should file the appeal before the appropriate appellate court, if so advised along with an application for condonation of delay which shall be considered in accordance with law.
The MATA is disposed of as withdrawn. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rules.
(S.K. Mishra) Judge
( Savitri Ratho) Judge Puspa
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!