Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 11200 Ori
Judgement Date : 1 November, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 31749 of 2021
Panabesh Satpathy ..... Petitioner
Mr. B.P. Satapathy, Advocate
Vs.
State of Odisha and others ..... Opposite Parties
State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
01.11.2021
Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Heard.
3. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to the opposite parties to regularize the service of the petitioner keeping in view the judgments of the apex Court in Secretary State of Karnataka and Others v. Umadevi (3) and Others (2006) 4 SCC 1; State of Karnataka and others v. M.L.Keshari and others, (2010) 9 SCC 247 and Amarkanti Rai v. State of Bihar and others, (2015) 8 SCC 265.
4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioner has made representation to opposite party no.1 vide Annexure-9 and the same may be directed to be disposed of keeping in view the ratio decided by the apex Court in Umadevi, M.L. Keshari and Amarkanti Rai (supra) within a stipulated time, to which learned counsel for the State has no objection.
5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party no.1 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-9 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law keeping in view the ratio decided by the apex Court in Umadevi & M.L. Keshari (supra) as well as Amarkanti Rai (supra) within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy this order.
Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) Alok JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!