Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

WP(C)/1731/2021
2021 Latest Caselaw 844 Ori

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 844 Ori
Judgement Date : 25 January, 2021

Orissa High Court
WP(C)/1731/2021 on 25 January, 2021
                          W.P.(C) No. 1731 of 2021




02.   25.01.2021          The matter is taken up through video conferencing.
                          Heard Mr. S.K. Rath, learned counsel for the
                   petitioners and Mr. B. Satpathy, learned Standing Counsel
                   for School and Mass Education Department.
                         The petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking
                   direction to opposite parties to extend all the benefits to the
                   petitioners taking into account the judgment of this Hon'ble
                   Court in the case of Ritanjali Giri @ Paul v. State of
                   Odisha (School & M.E. Deptt.) & others, 2016 (I) ILR-
                   1162 and to extend the benefits of the Odisha Education
                   (Leave of Teachers and other Members of the Staff of Aided
                   Educational Institutions) Rules, 1977 and further direction
                   be issued to the Opp.Parties to extend General Provident
                   Fund under the Orissa Aided Educational Institution
                   General Provident Fund Rules, 1983 and accordingly extend
                   all the benefits as applicable to the employees of aided
                   educational institutions within the meaning of Section-3(b)
                   of Orissa Education Act and Orissa Education (Recruitment
                   and Conditions of Service of Teachers and Members of the
                   Staff of Aided Educational Institutions) Rules, 1974 w.e.f.
                   20.01.2009 within the reasonable time to be stipulated by
                   this Court.
                         Mr. S.K. Rath, learned counsel for the petitioners has
                   contended that since the petitioners are working in an
                   educational institution receiving block grant, in view of the
                   judgment passed in Ritanjali Giri @ Paul v. State of
                   Odisha (School & M.E. Deptt.) & others, 2016 (I) ILR-
                   1162 wherein this Court has already held that the legal
                            2




heirs of deceased employees of educational institutions
receiving block grant are entitled to get compassionate
appointment, pursuant to which the Government of Odisha
in the Department of School & Mass Education has issued a
circular on 01.08.2019 granting benefit of compassionate
appointment to the legal heirs of the deceased employees
working   in   fully   aided   educational   institutions   and
educational institutions receiving grant-in-aid (New)/block
grant, therefore, other benefits as claimed in the writ
application should be extended to the petitioners.
     Mr. B. Satpathy, learned Standing Counsel for School
and Mass Education Department contended that in view of
law laid down in Ritanjali Giri @ Paul (supra) although
benefit of compassionate appointment to the legal heirs of
the deceased employees of educational institutions receiving
block grant has already been extended by the State
Government, pursuant to letter dated 01.08.2019, but so
far as other claims as made in this writ application, the
petitioners are not entitled to get the same, as because the
benefit of Grant-in-Aid Order, 1994 was denied by this
Court in State of Odisha v. Sri Lokanath Behera, 2018
(II) OLR 932, which has been confirmed by the apex Court
in Civil Appeal No. 7295 of 2019 arising out of SLP(C) No.
8343 of 2019 disposed of on 16.09.2019.
     Considering the contentions raised by learned counsel
for the parties and after going through the record, this
Court is of the considered view that since the benefit of
compassionate appointment to the legal heirs of deceased
employees of educational institutions receiving block grant
has already been extended by the authority, vide circular
                                     3




        dated     01.08.2019,    therefore,   without    expressing   any
        opinion on the merits of the case, the matter is remitted
        back to the authority concerned for consideration with
        regard to extension of other benefits as claimed in the writ
        application taking into account the ratio decided in
        Ritanjali Giri @ Paul (supra) within a period of four
        months from the date of communication of this order.
        Needless to mention, if it is found that the petitioners are
        entitled to get all the benefits, as claimed in the writ
        application in consonance with the law laid down in
        Ritanjali Giri @ Paul (supra), the same shall be granted
        within the time stipulated.
                The writ petition is thus disposed of.
                As the restrictions due to the COVID-19 situation are
        continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize the
        soft copy of this order available in the High Court's website
        or print out thereof at par with certified copies in the
        manner prescribed, vide Court's Notice No.4587, dated 25th
        March, 2020.


                                         ..................................

(Dr. B.R. Sarangi, J)

Ajaya

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter