Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 763 Ori
Judgement Date : 22 January, 2021
W.P.( C.M.P.
W.P.(C)
No.1360
No.1650
of 2015
of 2021
2 22.01.2021 This matter is taken up through Video conferencing.
Heard Sri B.Routrary, learned senior counsel for the
petitioner and Sri B.Mohanty, learned Standing Counsel for the
School & Mass Education Department.
Sri Routray, learned senior counsel appearing for the
petitioner drawing the attention of this Court through the judgment
of the State Administrative Tribunal in disposal of a batch of
Original Applications along with Original Application No.2954 (C)
of 2015 and taking this Court to the end of the observation of the
Tribunal at page 47 of the brief submitted the Tribunal while
quashing the order of cancellation of appointment involving the
petitioner and others directed for issuing fresh order of
appointment but for the subsequent observation of the Tribunal,
the Tribunal has clearly granted relief of notional benefit till the
date of their actual joining and discharging duty of the post. It is
also stated that this matter being challenged in this High Court,
the said challenge has come to an end with the dismissal of the
matter in disposal of W.P.(C).No.17990 of 2018 finds place at
page 48 to 54 of the brief. Referring to the document at
Annexure-5, Sri Routray, learned senior counsel appearing for
the petitioner submitted that even though there has been fresh
appointment order issued in favour of the petitioner on 21.6.2019,
but so far as working out of the notional benefit direction of the
Tribunal, there has been no grant of notional benefit in favour of
the petitioner as clearly appearing through Annexure-5 and there
is no full consideration of the case of the petitioner.
For the submission of Sri Routray, learned senior counsel,
since the petitioner was appointed on 11.6.2015 and cancellation
order came 6 months after been set aside with direction for grant
of notional benefit, the petitioner ought to have provided with
notional benefit from the date of appointment and not as per the
entitlements as disclosed in Annexure-5. Even though this aspect
-2-
is clearly borne through the materials produced herein, Sri B.
Mohanty, learned Standing Counsel for School & Mass Education
Department seeks some time to take instruction.
Considering the same, this Court grants two weeks time to
Sri Mohanty, learned Standing Counsel for the School & Mass
Education Department to take instruction and respond as to
whether the petitioner is entitled to the notional benefit from the
date of initial engagement or not? keeping in view the judgment
of the Tribunal being confirmed by the High Court in the aforesaid
matters.
Since W.P.(C).Nos.1684, 1685, 1686, 1687 of 2021 are
standing on similar footing, Registry is directed to place this
matter on 10.02.2021 along with the aforesaid connected cases
listed today.
As restrictions are continuing for Covid-19, petitioner may
utilize the soft copy of this order available in the High Court's
Website or print out thereof at par with certified copies in the
manner prescribed vide Court's Notification No.4587 dated
25.3.2020.
.
sks BISWANATH RATH,J
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!