Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

CRLMP/57/2021
2021 Latest Caselaw 650 Ori

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 650 Ori
Judgement Date : 20 January, 2021

Orissa High Court
CRLMP/57/2021 on 20 January, 2021
                               CRLMP No.57 of 2021




03.   20.1.2021         Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.
                  G.R. Mohapatra, learned Addl. Standing Counsel through
                  video conferencing mode.
                        According to the learned counsel for the petitioner,
                  the petitioner is aggrieved by the tardy manner in which
                  the investigation is being done in connection with Aul
                  P.S. Case No.06 of 2021. His main grievance is that
                  though F.I.R. has been registered against a number of
                  persons, however while some of the accused persons have
                  been arrested others have remained at large. Her further
                  grievance is that she and her family members are
                  remaining under constant threat from such accused
                  persons for which the opposite parties be directed to give
                  them protection.
                        Mr.    G.R.   Mohapatra,   learned   Addl.   Standing
                  Counsel relying on the decisions of the Supreme Court in
                  the case of Sakiri Vasu -vrs- State of U.P. and others
                  reported in (2008) 2 SCC 409 and in the case of Sudhir
                  Bhaskarrao Tambe -vrs- Hemant Yashwant Dhage and
                  others, reported in (2016) 6 SCC 277 submits that so far
                  as grievance relating to the manner of investigation is
                  concerned,    instead   of   moving    the    jurisdictional
                  Magistrate under Section 156(3), Cr.P.C., the petitioner
                  has unnecessarily rushed to this Court. He further
                  submits that in the aforesaid decisions, the Supreme
                  Court has made it clear that when after registering the
                  F.I.R., if no proper investigation is made, it would be
                  open to the aggrieved person to file an application under
                  Section 156(3), Cr.P.C. before the learned jurisdictional
        Magistrate and if such an application under Section
       156(3) is filed before the learned Magistrate, he/she can
       direct for a proper investigation.
              With regard to the prayer for giving protection, Mr.
       Mohapatra, learned Standing Counsel submits that for
       getting protection, the petitioner should approach the
       "Competent     Authority"    constituted   under    "Witness
       Protection Scheme, 2019" notified by the Government of
       Odisha vide Extra-ordinary Gazette Notification No.1164
       dated 6.7.2019 in tune with the judgment of the Supreme
Rns.   Court in the case of Mahender Chawla & others v.
       Union of India & others reported in (2019) (I) OLR (SC)
       126. According to him, since the petitioner is an
       informant, she being a star witness in case of a future
       trial, she can seek protection under the above noted
       scheme by filing a petition in the prescribed form before
       the "Competent Authority" consisting of the learned
       District & Sessions Judge as Chairman, head of the
       Police in the district as Member and head of prosecution
       in the district as its Member Secretary. He also submits
       that   the   said   Scheme   provides   different   types   of
       protection measures under Clause-7.
              In such background, learned counsel for the
       petitioner submits that liberty may be granted to the
       petitioner to move the jurisdictional Magistrate under
       Section 156(3), Cr.P.C. and to approach the "Competent
       Authority" for the purpose of getting protection.
              Considering the submissions made and without
       expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this
       Court grants liberty to the petitioner to move the
 jurisdictional court under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. by
filing an appropriate application duly supported by an
affidavit within a period of two weeks. In the event, such
an application is filed, the Jurisdictional Magistrate is
directed to proceed with the same in accordance with
law, if there is no other impediment. This Court also
grants liberty to the petitioner to move the "Competent
Authority" under the Witness Protection Scheme, 2019
in an appropriate manner. It is made clear that in the
event such a motion is made, the "Competent Authority"
should take a decision on such motion in tune with the
above noted Scheme as expeditiously as possible.
      The CRLMP is accordingly disposed of.
      Parties may utilize the soft copy of this order
available in the High Court's Website or print out thereof
at par with certified copy in the manner prescribed, vide
Court's Notice No.4587 dated 25.3.2020.


                                  ...................................
                                   BISWAJIT MOHANTY, J.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter