Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 630 Ori
Judgement Date : 19 January, 2021
W.P.(C) No.644 of 2021
02. 19.01.2021 This matter is taken up through video
conferencing.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition seeking
direction to the opposite parties to allow the petitioner to
draw TG scale of pay for having B.A., C.P.Ed. qualification by
treating it as B.P.Ed. from the date of first joining and
disburse the differential arrear salary with monthly revised
salary on the basis of the judgment passed in Niranjan
Nayak Vrs. State of Orissa and others, 2003(II) OLR 321
and further seeking direction to opposite party no.2 to
finalize the representation vide Annexure-5 within a
stipulated period.
In course of hearing, learned counsel appearing
for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievance, the
petitioner has made representation to opposite party no.2
vide Annexure-5 and direction may be given to consider the
same taking into consideration the ratio decided in Niranjan
Nayak (supra) within a stipulated time, to which learned
Additional Government Advocate has no objection.
In view of the aforesaid limited grievance of the
petitioner, this Court disposes of the Writ Petition directing
opposite party no.2 to take a decision on the representation
filed by the petitioner under Annexure-5 and pass
appropriate order in accordance with law taking into
consideration the ratio decided in Niranjan Nayak (supra)
within a period of three months from the date of production
of copy of this order.
Petitioner may utilize the soft copy of this order
available in the High Court's website or print out thereof at
par with certified copy in the manner prescribed, vide
Court's Notification No.4587 dated 25.3.2020.
..................................
Biswanath Rath, J.
kcb
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!