Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 540 Ori
Judgement Date : 15 January, 2021
W.P.(C) No.36571 of 2020
02. 15.01.2021 The matter is taken up through Video Conferencing
mode.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking
direction to opposite parties to regularize the service of the
petitioner as Asst. Project Director (Finance) in DRDA, Ganjam, as
per the ratio decided in the case of Sagarilal Murmu v. State of
Odisha, reported in 2015 (Supp.II) OLR 301 read with Rule-16 of
Odisha Group-B posts (Contractual Appointment) Rule, 2013 vide
Annexure- 5 & 7 respectively and further seeks direction to
opposite parties to grant all financial and consequential benefits
from the date of regularization of his service.
In course of hearing, learned counsel for the
petitioner states that highlighting grievance, the petitioner has
made representation to opposite parties no.1 vide Annexure-6
series, but no decision has yet been taken.
Considering the limited grievance of the petitioner
and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this
Court disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party no.1 to
take a decision on the representation filed by the petitioner vide
Annexure-6 series taking into account Annexures-5, 7 and the
judgment in Sagarilal Murmu (supra) and pass appropriate order
in accordance with law within a period of three months from the
date of communication of copy of this order.
As restrictions are continuing due to COVID-19,
petitioner(s) may utilize the soft copy of this order available in the
High Court's website or print out thereof at par with certified copies
in the manner prescribed, vide Court's Notice No.4587, dated
25.03.2020.
.....................................
Biswanath Rath, J.
uks
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!