Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1049 Ori
Judgement Date : 29 January, 2021
W.P.(C) NO.3237 OF 2021
2 29.1.2021 This matter is taken up through Video
Conferencing.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner has filed this application seeking
for a direction to the opposite parties to regularize his
services taking into account his continuous service of more
than 12 years, as has been done in favour of the other
similarly situated persons as per Government Circular and
in terms of the principle decided in Secretary State of
Karnataka and Others v. Umadevi (3) and Others (2006) 4
SCC 1 and in State of Karnataka & others Vrs. M.L. Kesari &
others involving SLP(C) No.15774/2006.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
the petitioner was engaged on monthly remuneration basis.
He has already rendered more than 12 years of service
under the opposite parties and therefore, seeks for
regularization of services in view of the judgment passed by
the Hon'ble apex Court in Secretary State of Karnataka and
others v. Umadevi (3) and others (2006) 4 SCC 1 and in
State of Karnataka & others Vrs. M.L. Kesari & others
involving SLP(C) No.15774/2006.
Considering the contentions raised by the
learned counsel for the petitioner and after going through
the records, it appears that the petitioner has rendered
service for more than 12 years on monthly remuneration
basis. Therefore, the case of the petitioner is squarely
covered by the ratio decided in the cases cited supra.
m In that view of the matter, this Court disposes of
this Writ Petition directing the opposite parties to consider
the case of the petitioner and regularize his services keeping
in view the judgment in the case of Secretary State of
Karnataka and others v. Umadevi (3) and others (2006) 4
SCC 1 and in State of Karnataka & others Vrs. M.L. Kesari &
others involving SLP(C) No.15774/2006 and also the
resolution of the G.A. Department dated 17.09.2013, within
a period of four months from the date of communication of a
copy of this order by the petitioner and grant consequential
service benefits as due admissible to him.
It is further directed that in the event the
petitioner is still continuing in his service, status quo as on
today in respect of the services of the petitioner shall be
maintained till a decision is taken in the matter by the
opposite parties in terms of the above direction.
The petitioner may utilise the soft copy of this
order available in the High Court's website or print out
thereof at par with certified copy in the manner prescribed,
vide Court's Notification No.4587 dated 25.3.2020.
..............................
Biswanath Rath, J.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!