Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4647 Ori
Judgement Date : 6 April, 2021
BLAPL No.4654 of 2020
05. 06.04.2021 This matter is taken up through video conferencing mode.
This is the second journey of the petitioner, who is in custody in
Baripada Town P.S. Case No.301 of 2010 corresponding to C.T.R.
No.1(C) of 2014, running for the alleged commission of offence under
section 420/34 of the IPC and section 4/5/6 of PCMCS (Banning) Act
and section 6 of OPID Act pending on the file of the learned Additional
Sessions Judge-cum-Designated Court (OPID), Balasore, in filing this
application under section 438, Cr.P.C., for his release on bail.
It is pertinent to state here that the prayer for bail to this
Petitioner had earlier been rejected in BLAPL No.480 of 2020.
Heard Mr.B.C.Gadai, learned counsel for the petitioner and
Mr.Bhuyan, learned counsel for the State appearing in OPID cases.
Perused the materials as placed including the final form.
The case has been registered for carrying out the alleged illegal
activities of collection of money from the innocent investors giving
them tall promises as to the return in one way or other with the aim to
cheat them from the beginning. It is said that being lured by said
promises, persons in huge numbers made substantial deposit of their
money. The petitioner is the Managing Director of M/s.Sastra
Enterprises Private Limited and M/s.Earnex Marketing Private Limited
in the name of which the activities were being carried out. It is stated
that so far traced out, the PAN INDIA situation as to collection of
funds is around Rs.28.26 Crores out of which in so far as the State of
Odisha is concerned, the collection is around Rs.4.86 crores form 1357
depositors. As finds mention in the charge-sheet, the Company by
engaging employees and agents, who are basically unemployed youths,
had been collecting huge amount from the innocent persons all
throughout making them believe that their investment in their hands are
all safe and secured and the returns are assured under different schemes
of the Companies. The trial of the case is going on. The petitioner hails
from the State of Tamil Nadu and no such material has been found out
to show that any of the Company has any such noticeable asset in this
State.
Considering the submissions made and on going through the
record; further keeping in view the large scale activity of the
Companies under the leadership of this petitioner in this State of
Odisha in collecting huge amount from large number of persons by
bringing them within the net with all such false promises made for the
purpose in a highly calculated manner as also the magnitude of the
offence in creating various companies, carrying out several other
activities, in a planned manner as to diversion of the funds so as to
avoid any future liability having wide ramifications and the tendency to
ruin the economy of the nation; this Court is not inclined to reconsider
the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
The BLAPL is dismissed accordingly.
As the restrictions due to the COVID-19 situation are
continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a soft copy of
this order/judgment available in the High Court's website or print out
thereof at par with certified copy in the manner prescribed, vide
Court's Notice No.4587 dated 25th March, 2020.
.......................
D. Dash,J.
Basu
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!