Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4639 Ori
Judgement Date : 6 April, 2021
W.P.(C) No.9724 of 2021
02. 06.04.2021 This matter is taken up through Video
Conferencing mode.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned counsel for the State.
The writ petition involves the following
prayer:
"It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court
may graciously be pleased to admit the writ petition and
issue Rule "NISI" to the Opp. Parties to show cause as to ;
(i) Why the rejection of the petitioner's claim for
her appointment under the Rehabilitation
Assistance Scheme made vide the impugned
communication dated 09.101.2020 under
Annexure-8 in the facts and circumstances of
the case will not be declared as illegal and as
such liable to be set aside; and
(ii) Why the Opposite Parties will not be directed to
consider the claim of the petitioner for her
appointment under R.A. Scheme as per the
existing rule prevalent at the time of death of
her husband, i.e. as per Notification of G.A.
Department dt.07.11.2016 and provide her
appointment within a stipulated time;
And if the Opp. Parties do not show cause
then the Rule be made absolute by issuing
appropriate writ/writs and any other order as
deem fit be passed;
And for this act of kindness, the petitioner
shall as in duty bound ever pray.
Looking to the date of death of the deceased
involving whom appointment under the Rehabilitation
Assistance Scheme is called for on 18.03.2017 and the
date of application for appointment under the
Rehabilitation Assistance Scheme since forwarded on
14.01.2019, this Court finds, the order of rejection vide
uks
2
Annexure-8 applying the provision in the 2020 rule,
which has even not seen the light of the day either on
the date of death or on the date of submission of
application for appointment under the Rehabilitation
Assistance Scheme, remains contrary to the decision of
this Court in disposal of W.P.(C) No.10168 of 2021 and
W.P.(C) No.8486 of 2021 and also the judgment of the
Hon'ble apex Court in the case of Canara Bank and
another Vs. Mahesh Kumar with two other matters
reported in (2015) 7 SCC 412. This Court, therefore,
interfering with the order vide Annexure-8 sets aside the
same and directs the Opposite Party No.4 to consider
the case of the Petitioner for appointment under the
Rehabilitation Assistance Scheme in terms of the
provision at Orissa Civil Services (Rehabilitation
Assistance) Rules, 1990 with the amended Rules, 2016.
In the event petitioner is otherwise qualified under the
aforesaid rule, appointment order in favour of the
petitioner in appropriate positioning be issued within
four weeks.
The entire exercise shall be completed
within a period of four weeks from the date of
communication of copy of this order by the Petitioner.
With the aforesaid observation and direction,
the writ petition stands disposed of.
As restrictions due to the COVID-19
situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties
may utilize the soft copy of this order available in the
High Court's website or print out thereof at par with
3
certified copies in the manner prescribed, vide Court's
Notice No.4587, dated 25th March, 2020.
..................................
Biswanath Rath, J.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!