Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

H. Sanjoy Singh vs State Of Manipur
2025 Latest Caselaw 542 Mani

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 542 Mani
Judgement Date : 2 September, 2025

Manipur High Court

H. Sanjoy Singh vs State Of Manipur on 2 September, 2025

Author: A. Guneshwar Sharma
Bench: A. Guneshwar Sharma
                                                                 Item No. 20

                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
                              AT IMPHAL

                           Crl.A. No. 10 of 2017

       H. Sanjoy Singh.
                                                        ...Appellant
                                 - Versus -
       State of Manipur.
                                                     ...Respondent

                          B EF O R E
           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA

                                ORDER

02-09-2025

[1] Heard Ms. Deepashree L., learned counsel for the appellant and

Mr, Athouba Khaidem, learned PP assisted by Mr. Phungyo Zingkhai,

learned Dy. Government Advocate for the State respondent.

[2] By the present appeal, the appellant challenged the impugned

judgment and order of conviction dated 27-06-2017 and the order of

sentence dated 04-07-2017 passed by the learned Special Judge (POCSO),

Thoubal in Special Trail (POCSO) Case No. 15 of 2014. By the impugned

order, the appellant was convicted to undergo simple imprisonment for a

period of 5 years under Section 366A of IPC and simple imprisonment for a

period of 8 years under Section 4 of POCSO Act and it was directed that

these two sentences were to run concurrently. By the order dated 04-07-

2017, it was directed to set off a period of 190 days already undergone as

UTP during the trial.

[3] The brief fact of the present case is that the appellant is an

accused in FIR No. 36(3)2013 KCG P.S. under Section 366A of IPC and

Section 4 of POCSO Act for the incident happened on 09-03-2013 and the

Trial Court after examining all the evidence and material on record,

convicted the appellant under Section 366A of IPC and Section 4 of POCSO

Act and passed the sentences as aforesaid. The appellant preferred this

appeal mainly on the ground that the Trial Court had failed to appreciate and

consider the material on record and there was defect in framing questions

under Section 313 of CrPC. The appellant was earlier released on bail

during COVID period and he was released by this Court vide order dated

27-02-2025 for undergoing treatment as his health condition deteriorated

while in custody and was released from custody on 12-03-2025 during the

pendency of the present appeal. Since then, he is on interim bail for taking

treatment.

[4] When the matter is taken up today, during the course of hearing,

Ms. Deepashree L., learned counsel for the appellant, submits that the

maximum imprisonment given to the petitioner is 8 years under Section 4 of

POCSO Act and as on date, the petitioner taking into remission and the set

off has undergone a total period of 6 years 10 months and 25 days. As on

the date of offence, the minimum punishment prescribed under Section 4 of

POCSO Act is 7 years and in the present case, the appellant was directed

to undergo 8 years of imprisonment. Since the appellant has undergone

substantive portion of the sentence awarded, in the present case, it will

suffice if the 8 years of imprisonment under Section 4 of POCSO Act is

reduced to the period of 7 years, the minimum period prescribed by the

statute during the relevant time.

[5] Mr. Athouba Khaidem, learned PP for the State respondent, fairly

submits that this Court may consider the alter submission made by the

learned counsel for the appellant provided this Court is not interfering the

order of conviction undergone.

[6] Considering the nature of the case, specially that the appellant has

already undergone a period of more than 6 years 10 months, this Court is of

the view that it will do justice if the period of conviction under Section 4 of

the POCSO Act is reduced to a period of 7 years. However, the order of

conviction under Section 366A of IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act is

upheld. Accordingly, it is directed that the appellant has to undergo the

remaining period, i.e. 1 month and 5 days in custody and the appellant is

directed to surrender before the Superintendent, Manipur Central Sajiwa on

or before 08-09-2025 to undergo the remaining period of 1 month and 5

days.

[7] With this observation, the criminal appeal is partly allowed.

[8] Pending application, if any, is also disposed of in terms of the

aforesaid order.



                                                            JUDGE

  Victoria



NINGOM Digitally signed
BAM     by NINGOMBAM
        VICTORIA
VICTORI Date: 2025.09.02
        17:20:56 +05'30'
A





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter