Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Shirui Village vs The State Of Manipur
2022 Latest Caselaw 371 Mani

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 371 Mani
Judgement Date : 17 August, 2022

Manipur High Court
The Shirui Village vs The State Of Manipur on 17 August, 2022
                                                          [1]

SHOUGRA Digitally
         by
                  signed

KPAM     SHOUGRAKPAM
         DEVANANDA
                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
DEVANAN SINGH
         Date: 2022.08.17
DA SINGH 16:03:01 +05'30'                      AT IMPHAL
                                         WP(C) No. 895 of 2019


                 The Shirui Village, represented by its Headman, Mr. Wungchangam
                 Shangh, aged about 40 years, P.O. & P.S. Ukhrul, Ukhrul District,
                 Manipur - 795142.
                                                                          ...Petitioner
                                                       -Versus -

                 1.     The State of Manipur, represented by Chief Secretary, Secretariat
                        Old Block, P.O. & P.S. Imphal, Imphal West - 795001.
                 2.     The Principal Secretary (PHED), Secretariat, P.O. & P.S. Imphal,
                        Imphal West - 795001.
                 3.     The Chief Engineer (PHED), PWD Building, Khoyathong, P.O. &
                        P.S. Imphal, Imphal West - 795001.
                 4.     The Deputy Commissioner, Ukhrul District, P.O. & P.S. Ukhrul,
                        Manipur - 795142.
                                                                           .... Respondents
                                           B E F O R E
                            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH
                      For the Petitioner          ::    Mr. Tungrei Ngakang, Advocate
                      For the respondents         ::    Mr. A. Vashum, Govt. Advocate
                      Date of Hearing             ::    07-07-2022
                      Date of Judgment            ::    17-08-2022

                                         J U D G M E N T

[1] Heard Mr. Tungrei Ngakang, learned counsel appearing for the

petitioner and Mr. A. Vashum, learned Government Advocate appearing for

the respondents.

[2] The present wit petition had been filed with a prayer for directing

the respondents to fulfill the agreement dated 15-06-1995 entered into

WP(C) No. 895 of 2019 Contd.../-

[2]

between the Shirui Village and Government of Manipur by appointing

unskilled staff required for attending and maintaining new water supply

scheme from the local candidates.

[3] The case of the petitioner is that during the 1980s, the

Government of Manipur approached the petitioner for supply of water to

inhabitants of Ukhrul town from Shirui Village with a promise that unskilled

staff would be appointed from the local populace of Shirui Village. On

arriving at an agreement, the water supply scheme for Ukhrul town was

commissioned in the early 1980s from Shirui Village and in return, the

Government of Manipur appointed thirteen candidates from the Shirui

Village as pipes linemen, Chowkidar, etc. It is the case of the petitioner that

out of the said thirteen employees, five have expired and three have retired

from services and accordingly, only five staff remained, which according to

the petitioner is a clear shortage of staff and it hampered implementation of

the water supply scheme in the proper manner.

[4] As the water supply scheme for the entire town of Ukhrul District

Headquarter from a single water source was not sufficient, the Government

of Manipur represented by the Minister of PHED and the Chief Engineer

(PHED) entered into a fresh agreement with the petitioner village on

15-06-1995 to explore other sources of water supply for supplying water to

Ukhrul town and that for providing a new water supply source by Shirui

Village, unskilled staff required for attending and maintaining the new water

supply scheme will be made from the local candidates of the Shirui Village.

 WP(C) No. 895 of 2019                                                 Contd.../-
                                       [3]


According to the petitioner, the petitioner's village offered two other sources

of water, namely, Khohthi Kongrei and Namra Kong in addition to the earlier

water source.

[5] In terms of the aforesaid agreement and as two more water

sources had been provided by the villagers of Shirui, several representations

and memorandum were submitted to the concerned authorities of the

Government of Manipur requesting for fulfilling the agreement entered into

between the representatives of the State Government and Shirui Villagers

by appointing unskilled staff from amongst the villagers of Shirui Village,

however, even after a lapse of more than 18 years from the date of execution

of the said agreement, the Government of Manipur did not appoint any

unskilled staff as per the aforesaid agreement. Having been aggrieved, the

petitioner approached this court by filing the present writ petition for

redressing its grievances.

[6] The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the whole

water sources of the petitioner's village have been given for the inhabitants

of Ukhrul town at the request of the Government of Manipur believing that

the State Government will give appointment to the residents of Shirui Village,

however, the Government have deliberately breach the agreement that had

been executed on 15-06-1995 which amounts to cheating and also violative

of Article 21 and 14 read with Article 15, 16, 46 and 335 of the Constitution.

[7] It has also been submitted that there is inadequacy of staff for

proper maintenance of water streams and pipelines for implementation of

WP(C) No. 895 of 2019 Contd.../-

[4]

water supply schemes in respect of Ukhrul town from Shirui Village and

there are sufficient manpower at the petitioner's village and also good

water sources and accordingly, the Government should gave appointment

to the villagers of Shirui Village in terms of the aforesaid agreement dated

15-06-1995 for providing water sources from Shirui Village and for proper

maintenance and implementation of the water supply scheme in respect of

Ukhrul town from Shirui Village.

[8] In the affidavit-in-opposition filed on behalf of the respondent

No. 1, it has been stated that the PHED had been performing its daily routine

works inspite of many difficulties and rendering services for the welfare of

the people. The water supply sources to Ukhrul town from Shirui Village has

been decreasing day by day due to drastic depletion of sources mainly due

to rampant deforestation at the catchment areas and forest fire. It has also

been stated that the Ukhrul PHE Division has been managing the quantity

of water received from two sources so as to fulfill the needs of the populace

and that sometimes leakage from breakdown occurred along the pipelines

from Shirui Village via. Langdang leading to Ukhrul town due to the

contraction/ expansion of the pipes and also due to frequent landslide during

monsoon and that repairing of such work are immediately done by the

manpower available to the Ukhrul PHE Division and regular water supply

was always maintained.

[9] In the said affidavit-in-opposition, it has also been stated that as

per the guidelines of "National Rural Drinking Water Programme" (NRDWP)

WP(C) No. 895 of 2019 Contd.../-

[5]

now followed throughout the country and also followed in the State of

Manipur, it is provided that day to day operation and maintenance of water

supply schemes are to be done by forming "Village Water & Sanitation

Committee" (VWSC) by volunteering manpower and their nominal

honorarium to be made from the charges collected by VWSC from the users.

It has also been stated that for Shirui Village, the VWSC has already been

formed and the matter relating to manpower is upto the VWSC and as such,

the Department does not require any unskilled manpower.

[10] It has also been clearly stated that the agreement dated

15-06-1995 between the then Minister of PHED, the Chief Engineer (PHED)

and the Headman of Shirui Village was that appointment for unskilled staff

required for the implementation of the new scheme will be made from the

local candidates and as the Department does not require any unskilled

manpower for implementation of the new water supply scheme, no

appointment has been given in terms of the said agreement.

[11] This court have considered the submissions made by the counsel

appearing for the parties and also considered the materials available on

record. The condition in the agreement is that the required unskilled staff for

maintaining/ implementing the new water supply scheme to the Ukhrul town

from Shirui Village will be appointed from the local candidates of Shirui

Village and the stand of the State Government is that there is no requirement

of any unskilled manpower for implementation/ maintenance of the said new

water supply scheme especially in view of the formation of Village Water and

WP(C) No. 895 of 2019 Contd.../-

[6]

Sanitation Committee in Shirui Village in terms of the guidelines of National

Rural Drinking Water Programme and accordingly, no appointment has

been made in terms of the aforesaid agreement. As the State Government

has not made any appointment of unskilled staff in the Ukhrul PHE Division

in violation of the terms and conditions of the agreement, this court did not

find any ground or reason for holding that the State Government had violated

the terms and conditions incorporated in the said agreement and

accordingly, this court is of the considered view that there is no ground for

directing the State Government to appoint unskilled staff from amongst the

villagers of Shirui Village in terms of the said agreement.

In view of the above, this court is not inclined to grant the relief

sought for by the petitioner in the present writ petition and accordingly, the

present writ petition is hereby dismissed as being devoid of merit. Keeping

in view the facts and circumstances of the present case, there will be no

order as to costs.




                                                          JUDGE

FR/NFR



Devananda




 WP(C) No. 895 of 2019                                                  Contd.../-
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter