Sunday, 07, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

R Naresh vs State Rep. By The Inspector Of Police
2026 Latest Caselaw 2771 Mad

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2771 Mad
Judgement Date : 22 May, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

R Naresh vs State Rep. By The Inspector Of Police on 22 May, 2026

                                                                              CRL OP No. 13509 of 2026


                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
                                                    DATED: 22-05-2026
                                                        CORAM
                                     THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL
                                                 CRL OP No. 13509 of 2026
                R Naresh
                S/o. Ramesh,
                No.22/39, Kamaraj Colony,
                3rd Street, Kodambakkam, Chennai.
                                                                              ..Petitioner/Accused
                                                           Vs
                State rep. by The Inspector of Police
                R-2 Kodambakkam Police Station
                Chennai
                (Crime No. 54/2026)
                                                                                    ..Respondent/
                                                                                     Complainant

                PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya
                Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 praying to enlarge the petitioner on
                pre-arrest bail in Crime No.54 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police.
                                                 CRL OP No. 13509 of 2026
                               For Petitioner:           Mr.S.Karthick


                               For Respondent(s):        Mr.C.R.Malarvannan,
                                                         Additional Public Prosecutor.

                                                         ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner on

19.05.2024 under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita

(BNSS), 2023 praying to grant an order of pre-arrest bail.

2. The petitioner / Accused, apprehends arrest at the hands of the

__________ Page1 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 126(2),

296(b) 118(1) 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023

in Crime No. 54 of 2026, on the file of the respondent police.

3. The case of the prosecution is that on 12.04.2026 at about 08.15 p.m.

at 6th street, Kamarajar Colony, Kodambakkam, the petitioner and another one

had abused and attacked the defacto complainant with a stone and used filthy

languages and threatened him. Hence, the case.

4. Mr.S.Karthick, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits

that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence

as alleged by the prosecution. He further submits that the petitioner is ready to

abide any conditions to be imposed by this Court. Accordingly, he prays to

grant an order of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner.

5. Mr.C.R.Malarvannan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing

for the respondent Police submits that the petitioner along with another attacked

and threatened the defacto complainant with dire consequences. The defacto

complainant sustained simple injury, for which he had taken treatment and he

was discharged. The co accused already got bail on 27.04.2026 before the XVII

Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Saidapet, Chennai. There are 11 previous cases

as against the petitioner. He further submits that the investigation of the case is __________ Page2 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

still pending and therefore, at this stage, if the pre-arrest bail is granted to the

petitioner, he will commit similar type of offence. Hence he prays to dismiss

this Criminal Original Petition.

6. Heard both sides. This Court has perused the records.

7. Considering the fact that the petitioner caused simple injuries to the

defacto complainant and the defacto complainant was discharged from the

hospital after taking treatment as in-patient and he is a permanent resident,

hence, there is less possibility of absconding and this Court is of the view that

the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required to the Investigating

Agency. Considering the same and also considering the facts and circumstances

of the case, the nature of the offence, this Court is inclined to grant pre-arrest

bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, pre-arrest bail is granted to the petitioner

subject to the following conditions:

(i) The petitioner shall be released on bail in the event of his arrest or in

the event of his surrender before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate No. XVII,

Saidapet, Chennai, within a period of 15 days from today, on his executing a

bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), along with two

sureties each for a like sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) to the

satisfaction of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate No. XVII, Saidapet,

Chennai;

__________ Page3 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

(ii) The sureties shall affix his photographs and left thumb impression in

the Application for Suretyship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal

Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Metropolitan Magistrate No. XVII,

Saidapet, Chennai, shall obtain a copy of any one of identity proofs to ensure

their identity;

(iii) The petitioner shall appear and sign before the respondent police,

daily at 10.00 a.m, until further orders;

(iv) The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by

police as and when required;

(v) The petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement,

threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to

dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

(vi) The petitioner shall not enter into the defacto complainant's house

and workplace; and

(vii) On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned

Metropolitan Magistrate No. XVII, Saidapet, Chennai, or Trial Court is entitled

to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the

aforementioned conditions are imposed by them as laid down by the Hon’ble

Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) 13 SCC 283].

__________ Page4 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

9. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed subject to the

conditions stated supra.

22.05.2026

Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No jrs/mtl

Note:-

1.Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the official website of this Court.

2.All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in official website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code.

To

1. The Metropolitan Magistrate No. XVII, Saidapet, Chennai.

2. The Inspector of Police R-2 Kodambakkam Police Station Chennai (Crime No. 54/2026)

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

__________ Page5 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

R.SAKTHIVEL J.

JRS

22-05-2026

__________ Page6 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter