Sunday, 07, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Raja Alias Soundarajan vs The State Rep By The Inspector Of Police
2026 Latest Caselaw 2759 Mad

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2759 Mad
Judgement Date : 22 May, 2026

[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Raja Alias Soundarajan vs The State Rep By The Inspector Of Police on 22 May, 2026

                                                                               CRL OP No. 13553 of 2026


                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
                                                     DATED: 22-05-2026
                                                         CORAM
                                    THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL
                                              CRL OP No. 13553 of 2026

                Raja Alias Soundarajan,
                S/o. Santhanam,
                No.50, Pillayar Koil Street, Koyambedu,
                Padikuppam, Chennai-600107.
                                                                          ..Petitioner/Sole Accused
                                                            Vs
                The State Rep. by,
                The Inspector of Police,
                V-5 Thirumangalam Police Station,
                Thirumangalam, Chennai.
                (Crime No.309 of 2026)
                                                                         ..Respondent/Complainant

                          PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of
                Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) Act, 2023, praying to enlarge the
                petitioner/sole accused on bail in the event of arrest in connection with the
                above said Crime No.309 of 2026 on the file of the Inspector of Police, V-5
                Thirumangalam Police Station, Thirumangalam, Chennai.
                                  For Petitioner :        Mr. B. Thirumalai

                                  For Respondent :        Mr. R. Ganesh Kumar,
                                                          Government Advocate (Criminal side)
                                                          Assisted by Mr. A. Mohammed Imran

                                                         ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner on

19.05.2026 under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS)

Act, 2023 praying to grant an order of pre-arrest bail.

__________ Page1 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

2. The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent

Police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 118(1) and 351(3) of

the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) Act, 2023, and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu

Prohibition of Harassment of Women (TNPHW) Act, in Crime No.309 of 2026

on the file of the respondent police.

3. The case of the prosecution is that, the defacto complainant is the

wife of the petitioner. Due to certain domestic misunderstandings, a wordy

quarrel arose between them on 11.05.2026, during which the petitioner,

suspecting the defacto complainant, assaulted her with a stick and caused simple

injuries. Hence, the case.

4. Mr. B. Thirumalai, the learned counsel for the petitioner, submits

that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged

by the prosecution. He further submits that the petitioner has been falsely

implicated in this case. He however submits that the petitioner is ready to abide

by any conditions to be imposed by this Court. Accordingly, he prays to grant

an order of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner.

5. Per contra, Mr. R. Ganesh Kumar, the learned Government

Advocate (Criminal Side) assisted by Mr.A.Mohammed Imran, appearing for

__________ Page2 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

the respondent-police, submits that the petitioner assaulted the defacto

complainant with a stick and caused injuries to her, abused her in filthy

language, and threatened her with dire consequences. He further submits that no

previous cases are pending against the petitioner. He also submits that if pre-

arrest bail is granted to the petitioner, he will abscond and tamper with the

evidence. Therefore, he prays to dismiss this Criminal Original Petition.

6. Heard on both sides'. This Court has perused the material records

available in the bundle.

7. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, the

submissions made by both sides, this Court is of the view that custodial

interrogation of the petitioner may not be required to the Investigating Agency.

Hence, this Court is inclined to grant an order of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner

subject to the following conditions:-

(i) The petitioner shall be released on pre-arrest bail in

the event of his arrest or in the event of his surrender before the

learned XIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai,

within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order

copy is made ready, on executing a bond for a sum of

Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) along with two __________ Page3 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

sureties each for a like sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten

Thousand only) to the satisfaction of the learned XIII

Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai;

(ii) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left

thumb impression in the Application for Suretyship [Judicial

Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019'].

The learned Judicial Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one

of identity proofs to ensure their identity;

(iii) The petitioner shall appear and sign before the

respondent-police daily at 10:00 A.M., until further orders;

(iv) The petitioner shall make himself available for

interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

(v) The petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make

any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted

with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing

such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

(vi) The petitioner shall also not, directly or indirectly,

cause any threat to the de facto complainant and witnesses and

shall not tamper the evidence;

(vii) The petitioner shall not leave India without the

previous permission of the Court;

__________ Page4 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

(viii) The petitioner shall furnish his residential address

and mobile number to the concerned Magistrate;

(ix) On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions,

the learned XIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai,

is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in

accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions are

imposed by him as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in

P.K. Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005) 13 SCC 283].

8. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed subject to

the conditions stated supra.

22-05-2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No klt/gbi

Note:-

1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the official website of this Court.

2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in official website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code.

__________ Page5 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

R.SAKTHIVEL, J.

klt/gbi

To

1. The learned XIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai.

2. The Inspector of Police, V-5 Thirumangalam Police Station, Thirumangalam, Chennai.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

22-05-2026

__________ Page6 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter